Back

Multidimensional control of ingestive behavior by lateral hypothalamic neurotensin neurons

Sumarli, D.; Loveless, M. C.; Davis, G. O.; Schroeder, K. W.; Ma, S.; Bryan, C. L.; Vu, E.; Kernan, M.; Gordon, A.; Stuber, G. D.; Morton, G. J.; Soden, M. E.

2026-07-22 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.17.737325 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Consumption of food and water is regulated by interactions between neural circuits that govern motivational drive states, arousal, motor activity, and reward signaling, among other factors. Neurons in the lateral hypothalamus that express the neuropeptide neurotensin (LH-Nts neurons) are known to influence many of these elements, but their precise role in regulating specific aspects of ingestive behavior remains unclear. Utilizing a tightly controlled head-fixed task, we find that LH-Nts neurons strongly encode the rate of licking for water and sweet solutions, with weaker modulation of activity by solution identity and restriction state. Silencing LH-Nts neurons reduces water intake but has little direct effect on hunger or satiety. Instead, we find that these neurons impact multiple underlying behavioral components necessary for food consumption, including arousal and engagement with a novel food source, and also influence thermoregulation and metabolism. Together, these data establish tonic activity of LH-Nts neurons as a critical signal supporting exploration and volitional movement, while also delineating a role for these neurons in driving active consumption, particularly of water. Furthermore, quantitative projection mapping revealed widespread innervation of structures linked to thirst, arousal, reward, metabolism, and facial motor control, suggesting that these neurons play an important role coordinating neural circuits governing multiple different aspects of ingestion.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.