Antidepressant Maintenance Versus Active Monitoring After Depression Remission: A Decision Analysis Stratified by Relapse Risk and Patient Preferences
Meyerson, W. U.; Cai, T.; Smoller, J. W.
Show abstract
Importance: Patients who achieve remission from major depressive disorder (MDD) often face a preference-sensitive decision between continued antidepressant maintenance and discontinuation with active monitoring. Quantifying the tradeoff between depression burden and long-term medication exposure may support more individualized shared decision-making. Objective: To quantify tradeoffs between continuous antidepressant maintenance and active monitoring after MDD remission, and to identify preference thresholds favoring each strategy across relapse-risk strata. Design: Individual-level decision-analytic health-state transition model calibrated to randomized maintenance-discontinuation trials and a longitudinal first depressive episode cohort, with a 5-year time horizon. Setting: Outpatient clinical decision after completion of an 8-month continuation phase following remission from MDD. Participants: Adults in remission from MDD, represented across 4 clinically anchored relapse-risk strata ranging from very low risk after a first mild episode to high risk after highly recurrent depression. Exposures: Continuous antidepressant maintenance vs discontinuation with active monitoring and antidepressant restart after detected relapse. Main Outcomes and Measures: Severity-weighted depression-months, antidepressant medication-years, medication-years per depression-month averted, and net benefit across preference thresholds defined as the maximum additional medication-years a patient would be willing to accept to avert 1 depression-month. Results: Continuous maintenance reduced depression burden but required substantially more medication exposure, with efficiency strongly dependent on relapse risk. Medication-years per depression-month averted ranged from 11.8 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 7.8-19.6) in the very low-risk group to 1.5 (95% UI, 0.8-3.0) in the high-risk group. At a preference threshold of 3 medication-years per depression-month averted, maintenance was preferred for moderate- and high-risk patients; at a threshold of 2, only for high-risk patients; and at a threshold of 1, for no risk group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this decision-analytic model, the value of continuous antidepressant maintenance depended strongly on baseline relapse risk and patient preferences regarding long-term medication exposure. These findings provide a quantitative framework for shared decision-making about antidepressant maintenance after remission from MDD.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Consistent Differential Effects of Bupropion and Mirtazapine in Major Depression 95%
- Depression is Associated with Treatment Response Trajectories in Adults with Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Machine Learning Analysis 93%
- The Cost-Effectiveness Of Depression Screening For The General Adult Population 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A computational approach to understanding effort-based decision-making in depression 93%
- Longitudinal impact of different treatment sequences of second-generation antipsychotics on metabolic outcomes: a study using targeted maximum likelihood estimation 92%
- Sociodemographic, clinical, and genetic factors associated with self-reported antidepressant response outcomes in the UK Biobank 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decoding Treatment Choice: Genetic and Phenotypic Analyses of Long-term Antidepressant Acceptability 92%
- Evidence for a serotonergic subtype of major depressive disorder: A NeuroPharm-1 study. 91%
- Longitudinal Changes in Functional Connectivity in Antipsychotic-treated and Antipsychotic-naive Patients with First Episode Psychosis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The development and validation of a prognostic model to predict relapse in adults with remitted depression in primary care: secondary analysis of pooled individual participant data from multiple studies 92%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Antidepressant Prescribing with a focus on people with learning disability and autism: An interrupted time-series analysis in England using OpenSAFELY-TPP 90%
- Co-prescription of Metformin and Antipsychotics in Severe Mental Illness: A UK Primary Care Cohort Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of esketamine for treatment resistant depression: registered report for a Systematic Review with an Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials 91%
- Frailty in individuals with depression, bipolar disorder and anxiety disorders: longitudinal analyses of all-cause mortality 89%
- Genetic predisposition to psychiatric disorders and risk of COVID-19 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.