Back

Small-area estimation of district-level fertility in 36 countries in sub-Saharan Africa 2000-2025

Stevens, O.; Imai-Eaton, J. W.

2026-07-20 public and global health
10.64898/2026.07.17.26358322 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: District-level estimates of fertility are required by policymakers and programme planners in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to guide decision making at the local level. Existing approaches to produce fertility estimates at the district level use age-structures or total fertility trends over time from higher administrative levels which prevents representation of district-level heterogeneity in fertility estimates. Methods: We extracted observed numbers of births and person-years stratified by five-year age group, single calendar year, and district from 194 nationally-representative household surveys. We constructed a spatiotemporal Bayesian hierarchical model that reconciles point and areal data and adjusts for non-sampling biases to estimate age-specific (ASFR) and total fertility rates (TFR) in 36 countries between 2000-2025. Results: Fertility rates were calibrated to three million births from two million women over fifteen million person-years. TFR declined in the majority of countries 2000-2020 (median -15%, interquartile range (IQR) -3 to -24%). Substantial subnational heterogeneity in TFR levels was observed in most countries, exceeding that of differences between national fertility levels. ASFR heterogeneity was observed, though to a lesser degree than variation in total fertility. Teenage fertility was unchanged in several countries, with fertility declines driven by older age groups. Conclusion: District-level fertility dynamics can differ greatly from national TFR trends and age-patterns of fertility. Use of national fertility rates will produce inaccurate estimates of births in the majority of SSA districts, leading to inappropriate resource management for key global public health objectives.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
18.7%
2
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
3
The Lancet Global Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Malaria Journal
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
7
Journal of Global Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.3%
9
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
11
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
12
Tropical Medicine & International Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.1%
14
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
18
Global Health Action
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.9%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
25
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%