Back

Mechanism of response to FHD-286 and decitabine combination in patients with advanced myeloid malignancies

Collins, M. P.; Lahr, D. L.; Topal, S.; Khalil, A.; Hickman, D.; Spidale, N.; Pandit, N.; Reilly, S.; Lyons, K.; Horrigan, K.; Zhao, T.; Batonga, J.; Bosinger, M.; D'Aco, K.; Ball, B.; Kishtagari, A.; DiNardo, C. D.; Stein, E. M.; Quintas-Cardama, A.; Smolen, G. A.

2026-07-20 oncology
10.64898/2026.07.17.26358055 medRxiv
Show abstract

Impaired cellular differentiation is a defining characteristic of myeloid malignancies and remains a major therapeutic challenge. The BRG1/Brahma-associated factor (BAF) chromatin remodeling complex, through the ATPases SMARCA4 and SMARCA2, maintains the stemness of leukemic blasts and thus represents a promising target for novel differentiation-based therapies. In a phase 1 study in advanced myeloid malignancies, the first-in-class dual SMARCA4/2 inhibitor FHD-286 combined with decitabine (DAC) was tolerated and produced an objective response rate of 12.8% (6/47) compared with no responses with FHD-286 monotherapy. To understand the basis of this activity, we integrated high-dimensional flow cytometry and single-cell genomic analyses of longitudinal bone marrow samples from responders and nonresponders. While FHD-286 monotherapy was predominantly associated with myeloid differentiation, responders to FHD-286+DAC combination therapy exhibited a range of myeloid and erythroid differentiation trajectories. FHD-286 potentiated the transcriptional impact of DAC, driving tumor clones to fully differentiate out of the immunophenotypically and transcriptionally defined blast compartment. Responders had a baseline transcriptional profile similar to that of CEBPA-mutant acute myeloid leukemia and showed further downregulation of CEBPA upon treatment. These findings reinforce tumor cell differentiation as a mechanism of response to pharmacologic SMARCA4/2 inhibition and support further evaluation of FHD-286+DAC in molecularly defined patient subsets.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.