Back

Sex and ethnicity differences in coronary heart disease: A UK-based tri-ethnic cohort analysis

Smeeth, D.; Eastwood, S. V.; Wong, A.; Hughes, A. D.; Chaturvedi, N.

2026-07-20 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.07.17.26357977 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and aims: Sex differences in ethnic minority risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) are often overlooked. Here we aim to explore sex-by-ethnicity differences in CHD outcomes and the contribution of risk factors. Methods: Incident CHD events were identified for Europeans, and South Asian and African/African Caribbean first generation migrants in the UK-based Southall and Brent Revisited (SABRE) cohort. Cardiovascular risk factors were assessed at baseline (1988-91). Cox proportional hazards models quantified group differences in CHD incidence and risk factor contribution. Population attributable fractions (PAFs) described risk factor contribution to group differences. Results: Among 4,754 participants followed for 40.8 years, 1,710 CHD first events occurred. Cumulative incidence of CHD was highest in South Asian males (65% by age 90) and females (55%), compared with 52% in European males and 24-31% in other groups. Sex differences in CHD incidence were pronounced in Europeans (female versus male HR=0.45, 95% CI [0.37,0.55]) but attenuated in South Asians (0.68 [0.56,0.82]) and African/African Caribbeans (0.79 [0.57,1.10]). CHD risk was higher in South Asian compared to European men (1.80 [1.63,1.99]). This ethnic difference was greater in females (2.44 [1.88,3.17]). PAFs for diabetes (PAF=18.0%, 95% CI [6.2,29.8]), hypercholesterolemia (44.2% [20.4,68.1]), and hypertriglyceridemia (22.4% [7.9,37.0]) made a greater contribution to the risk of CHD in South Asian females compared to all other groups. Conclusions: Ethnic minority female participants do not have the same protection from CHD as Europeans. Greater cardiometabolic burden may drive this elevated CHD risk and loss of female protection.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
11.9%
3
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
5
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
Atherosclerosis
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.4%
10
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
15
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
17
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
18
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
19
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
22
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
23
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Obesity
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%