Back

The Registry of Pregnant Women at Cruces University Hospital: an ethical framework for prospective research with preanalytical optimization of maternal plasma processing

Gonzalez-Moro, I.; Sanchez-Garcia, H.; Medina Cuesta, T.; Rodriguez Lirio, A.; Espin Lopez, M. d. P.; Esquivel Gonzalez, S.; Quintana Ochoa de Alda, E.; de la Pena-Sanz, M.; Marin Cano, L.; Sarasua-Blanco, N.; Ortiz Salinas, P.; Sanfeliu Padulles, A.; Ruiz Adrian, A.; Martinez Isidoro, A.; Aldaiturriaga Otaola, A.; Aramburu Gil, A.; Garcia Gil, A.; Saenz Saenz, A.; Heredia Campos, A.; Fernandez Salado, A.; Ramirez Jarana, A. I.; Tobar Lopez, A. I.; Casarojos Oses, A. J.; Martinez de Maranon Toral, A.; Satiago Hidalgo, A.; Silva Diaz, A.; Basterrechea Miguel, A.; Castanos Lasa, A.; Esteras Vadi

2026-07-17 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.07.17.26357942 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Prospective pregnancy registries and biobanking infrastructures are essential for future translational studies investigating maternal, placental and offspring health. However, circulating nucleic acid analyses are highly sensitive to preanalytical variability, particularly regarding blood-collection tube type and sample processing conditions. We established a prospective pregnancy registry and biobanking workflow at Cruces University Hospital and evaluated the impact of preanalytical variables on circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and cell-free RNA (cfRNA) preservation in maternal plasma collected at delivery. Methods: The Registry of Pregnant Women at Cruces University Hospital was designed as a prospective infrastructure integrating placental sampling, maternal blood collection and ethically controlled future access to maternal and offspring clinical data. Within this framework, peripheral blood samples from 50 women at delivery were simultaneously collected into EDTA, Norgen and Roche tubes. Plasma samples processed within or after 24 hours following collection underwent cfDNA/cfRNA extraction, electrophoretic profiling, fluorometric quantification and RT-qPCR analyses targeting different stress-related genes. Results: By the end of June 2026, 1,127 women had been prospectively recruited into the registry, with 661 plasma samples, 637 serum samples and 858 sets of four placental biopsies collected, processed and stored in the Basque Biobank. In the preanalytical substudy, EDTA tubes yielded higher cfDNA concentrations, likely reflecting reduced cellular preservation and genomic DNA contamination. In contrast, Roche tubes showed superior cfRNA preservation, with higher cfRNA concentrations and more consistent detection of the characteristic 5S rRNA peak compared with EDTA and Norgen tubes. Processing delays beyond 24 hours reduced cfRNA concentration, while associations between circulating transcripts and gestational age were more consistently detectable in preservative-containing tubes. Conclusions: Prospective infrastructures like ours offer strong foundation for large scale, long-term studies in the framework of the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease hypothesis. Technically, Roche tubes provided superior cfRNA preservation and enhanced sensitivity for detecting subtle biological associations, supporting the importance of standardized preanalytical workflows within prospective pregnancy biobanking resource.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.3%
2
Human Reproduction
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.5%
3
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
4
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.0%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.1%
7
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.5%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
10
Biology of Reproduction
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
11
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
12
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
13
Placenta
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
15
RNA Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
20
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
21
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
22
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%
23
JAMA
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
24
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
25
Journal of Neuroinflammation
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
27
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%