Do lovebirds ever forget? Long-term memory retention and adaptive forgetting in rosy-faced lovebirds
Wang, S.; Li, J. W. J.; Ma, C.; Poon, E. S. K.; Sin, S. Y. W.
Show abstract
Long-term memory has been extensively documented in many animals across a range of ecological contexts. Far less is understood, however, about how long memories persist after active modification or how conflicting memories are adaptively regulated to enable flexible behaviour. Parrots are widely recognized for their high intelligence and cognitive capability, yet the study of memory has focused on only a handful of large parrot species. Here, using a binary choice symbolic system, we conducted three experiments on 28 rosy-faced lovebirds (Agapornis roseicollis) to investigate (1) memory retention of initial associative learning at intervals of two weeks, half a year, and one year; (2) reversal learning, where the rewarded and unrewarded symbols were swapped; and (3) memory retention, following reversal learning at two-week and half-year intervals. We revealed that (a) initial associative learning memory was strikingly persistent, remaining detectable after nearly 600 days; (b) reversal learning performance was comparable to that of large parrot species; and (c) while the post-reversal forgetting curve mirrored the pattern of initial learning, it exhibited a shorter retention duration and a lower retention plateau. These findings suggest that forgetting may serve as an adaptive mechanism that regulates the retrievability of conflicting information, rather than a simple erasure of memory traces. When the environment changes, the retrievability of previously functional but now maladaptive memories is suppressed, but their long-term storage is preserved for potential future use under analogous circumstances. Such dynamic regulations prevent the repetitive overwriting of information in a fluctuating environment, thereby fostering greater behavioural flexibility across dynamic scenarios.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) excel in a one-trial spatial memory test, yet perform poorly in a classical memory task 96%
- Cleaner wrasse failed in early testing stages of both visual and spatial Working Memory paradigms 95%
- Response learning confounds accurate assays of inhibitory control 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Great tits show serial reversal learning in the perseverance phase but not in the new learning phase 96%
- A systematic examination of learning in the invasive ant Linepithema humile reveals very rapid development of short and long-term memory 94%
- An educated guess: how coral reef fish make decisions under uncertainty 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple context discrimination in adult rats: sex variability and dynamics of time-dependent generalization of an aversive memory 93%
- Reducing shock imminence eliminates poor avoidance in rats 93%
- Cognitive limits of larval Drosophila: Testing for conditioned inhibition, sensory preconditioning and second-order conditioning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning a non-neutral conditioned stimulus: place preference in the crab Neohelice granulata 94%
- Honey bees can store and retrieve independent memory traces after complex experiences that combine appetitive and aversive associations 94%
- Appetitive learning relies on octopamine and dopamine in ants 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.