Back

Altered neuronal start codon stringency favors cap-independent repeat-associated non-AUG translation

Wieland, C. M.; Wright, S.; Willey, S.; Purwar, I.; Grudzein, S. J.; Laimon, E.; Asher, M. J.; Isaacs, A.; Garner, A. L.; Todd, P.

2026-07-21 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.16.739042 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intronic GGGGCC repeat expansions in C9orf72 cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). This expansion supports a non-canonical form of translational initiation known as repeat-associated non-AUG (RAN) translation to produce toxic dipeptide repeat proteins that contribute to neurodegeneration. Here, we find that the efficiency of RAN translation and its dependency on the 5' 7-methylguanosine mRNA cap are variable across cell types, with both rodent neurons and human iNeurons favoring cap-independent RAN translation from two distinct repeats (CGG and GGGGCC) across multiple reading frames. Treatment with an eIF4E inhibitor that blocks global cap-dependent translation enhances RAN translation specifically in neurons. Intriguingly, cap-independent RAN translation exhibits less reliance on near-cognate codons for initiation than cap-dependent RAN translation. This finding led us to identify a surprising global increase in start codon stringency in neurons as a contributor to the relatively higher cap-independent RAN translation in this cell type. This effect correlates with a cytoplasmic redistribution of eIF1 in neurons and is reversed with neuronal overexpression of the eukaryotic initiation factor eIF5, which relaxes start codon stringency and selectively enhances cap-dependent RAN translation. Taken together, these findings reveal several neuron-specific features of translational regulation that favor cap-independent RAN translation with implications for nucleotide repeat expansion disorder pathogenesis and neuronal translational regulation. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=82 SRC="FIGDIR/small/739042v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (16K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@61a6cforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10e8e64org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a6689aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11d683b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.