GW182 silencing domain engages the tristetraprolin-binding pocket of CNOT1 to recruit CNOT1 into multiprotein condensates
Bialobrzewski, M. K.; Cieplak-Rotowska, M. K.; Michas, A.; Staszalek, Z.; Sonenberg, N.; Dadlez, M.; Niedzwiecka, A.
Show abstract
GW182 recruits the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex through its CIM1 region, yet the CNOT1 surface mediating this interaction has remained unknown. Using hydrogen- deuterium exchange mass spectrometry, we map CIM1 binding to a hydrophobic groove within CNOT1 residues 800-999. Unexpectedly, this groove coincides with the tristetraprolin (TTP)-binding pocket. CIM1 and the C-terminal TTP peptide engage this surface through a shared RL(P/{zeta})X{Omega} sequence pattern despite lacking overall homology, suggesting a convergently evolved short linear motif (SLiM). We further show that the GW182 silencing domain (GW182 SD) and TTP compete for CNOT1 binding using orthogonal in vitro assays, including a reconstituted liquid-liquid phase separation system in which GW182 SD acts as a scaffold and recruits CNOT1 as a client through specific binding. These findings define a shared CNOT1 recognition site and reveal SLiM-mediated competition as a molecular principle governing CCR4-NOT engagement, with consequences for GW182-driven silencing condensate assembly in vitro. SignificanceGW182 silencing domain binds the tristetraprolin pocket of CNOT1 and recruits it into multiprotein condensates, providing a biophysical framework for coordinated miRNA- and ARE-mediated gene expression regulation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Barrier properties of Nup98 FG phases ruled by FG motif identity and inter-FG spacer length 98%
- Single-molecule tweezers decoding hidden dimerization patterns of membrane proteins within lipid bilayers 98%
- The juxtamembrane linker of synaptotagmin 1 regulates Ca2+ binding via liquid-liquid phase separation 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.