Surface electrostatic networks control hydrophobic core remodeling in a pH-dependent switching protein
McDonald, I. M.; Socas, L. B.; Walton-Raaby, M.; Liu, X.; Dasari, S.; Emmanuel, B. G.; Butt, M. S.; Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Brooks, C. L.; Meiering, E. M.
Show abstract
Communication between protein surfaces and their buried cores is central to protein structure and function, yet this phenomenon remains challenging to predict and control at high resolution. Changes in the protonation of surface ionizable residues communicate with the hydrophobic core, for example, in diverse pH-dependent protein functions. Hisactophilin, a histidine-rich actin- and membrane-binding protein, provides a general model for exploring such communication as it exhibits a finely tuned pH-regulated myristoyl-switching function. Upon reversible proton binding, the myristoyl group shifts between being sequestered in the hydrophobic core and more solvent accessible. In the current study we utilize experimental and computational approaches we uncover how binding of [~]1.5 net protons alters electrostatic interactions involving ionizable residues distributed across much of the protein surface. These changes are transmitted to the hydrophobic core through dynamic communities of ionizable and hydrophobic residues which substantially rearrange upon switching. The effects of mutating individual ionizable residues are weaker than those of core hydrophobic residues, and only combined mutation of multiple ionizable residues caused substantial functional change. Together, these results reveal how communication between surface ionizable residues and the hydrophobic core is mediated by extensive interaction networks that reorganize in response to changes in protonation. These results may provide general insights for understanding protein cooperativity and the coupling of surface and core residues in protein function, disease, evolution, engineering, and design. Significance StatementHow changes on the protein surface, such as proton binding to ionizable amino acids, are communicated to the protein core to regulate protein stability and function remains ill-defined. Synthesis of experimental and computational analyses resolves the distributed networks of surface ionizable residue interactions coupled to the hydrophobic core that control pH-dependent myristoyl switching in hisactophilin. Small changes in protonation that create and alleviate local electrostatic repulsion give rise to protein-wide changes in fluctuating surface-core interactions. This distributed electrostatics-core coupling mechanism may help explain the often underrecognized and long-range impacts of ionizable residues in proteins and provide a framework for interpreting the effects of mutations in fundamental and applied protein science.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The conformational landscape of fold-switcher KaiB is tuned to the circadian rhythm timescale 96%
- Identifying Sequence Perturbations to an Intrinsically Disordered Protein that Determine Its Phase Separation Behavior 96%
- Phosphatase SHP2 pathogenic mutations enhance activity by altering conformational sampling 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chemical mechanism of allosteric and asymmetric dark reversion in a bacterial phytochrome uncovered by cryo-EM. 96%
- Mass spectrometry of RNA-binding proteins during liquid-liquid phase separation reveals distinct assembly mechanisms and droplet architectures 95%
- Structural insights into the opening mechanism of C1C2 channelrhodopsin 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular mechanism of Mad2 conformational conversion promoted by the Mad2-interaction motif of Cdc20 96%
- The amino acid sequence determines protein abundance through its conformational stability and reduced synthesis cost. 95%
- Polyglutamine expansion induced dynamic misfolding of Androgen Receptor 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.