Back

Developmental stage-dependent decoupling of molecular and phenotypic responses to heat in wheat grain

Masoomi-Aladizgeh, F.; Ashhurst, T. M.; Quek, L.-E.; Asar, Y.; Moore, C. L.; Lee, S.; Bokshi, A. I.; Johnson, E.; Dowland, S.; Wood, M. L.; Begcy, K.; Crossett, B.; Khoddami, A.; Trethowan, R.; Tan, D. K. Y.; Atwell, B. J.; Roberts, T. H.

2026-07-20 plant biology
10.64898/2026.07.16.733488 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Heatwaves during flowering and grain development threaten global wheat production, yet the extent to which developmental stage shapes molecular and phenotypic responses remains unclear. Here, we investigated whether heat stress (36/29{degrees}C for 48 h) imposed at closely spaced developmental stages surrounding anthesis generates stage-specific molecular responses that are associated with subsequent effects on grain properties. Heat exposure increased floret abortion most strongly when it was imposed at the trinucleate stage (TN; [~]48%) compared with the binucleate (BN) and early post-anthesis stages. Methylation levels were largely unaffected by prior heat treatments; however, heat induced stage- and locus-specific methylation changes, particularly at BN. Spatial RNA-seq revealed tissue-specific heat responses that were distinctively different in BN and TN. Integrated metabolomic analyses revealed stage-dependent metabolic reprogramming, including shifts towards stress-associated pathways. Despite heat stress at BN generating broader molecular reprogramming in developing grain, exposure at TN produced stronger effects on grain set and composition, revealing a decoupling between the magnitude of responses and phenotypic outcomes. Together, these findings demonstrate that subtle differences in developmental stage influence the complex molecular responses to heat and subsequent grain properties.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.