Back

Beyond reductions in depressive symptoms: Functional, social, and household outcomes in a pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial of group interpersonal psychotherapy in rural Uganda

Atuhumuza, E.; Ssanyu, J. N.; Kasujja, R.; Ndeezi, M.; Nakalungi, S.; Huang, C.; Fraker, A.

2026-07-18 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.07.16.26358298 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Group interpersonal psychotherapy may improve outcomes beyond depressive symptoms, but evidence on functioning, social support, and household welfare remains limited. We examined these outcomes using mixed methods in a pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial of a six-week intervention in rural Uganda. Methods: Twenty-four villages were randomized to group interpersonal psychotherapy or enhanced care as usual. Eligible participants were female, aged at least 13 years, with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores of 10 or more. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, two weeks, and three months after treatment. Regression models used village-clustered standard errors. Exploratory sensitivity analyses compared controls with 33 intervention participants assessed independently of facilitators and after an honesty and confidentiality prompt. Fourteen interviews and three focus group discussions with 30 intervention participants were analysed thematically and integrated by outcome domain. Results: Of 292 randomized participants, 263 completed the three-month assessment. Intervention participants had lower anxiety scores than controls at three months (mean difference -7.18; p<0.001), higher subjective wellbeing (mean difference 3.70; p<0.001), lower disability scores (mean difference -1.01; p<0.001), greater perceived social support (difference 23.4 percentage points; p<0.001), and more meals reported for children in the previous 24 hours (mean difference 0.62; p<0.001). Household food insecurity was lower in the full-sample analysis (difference -23.3 percentage points; p=0.008), but not in the exploratory sensitivity analysis (difference 1.5 percentage points; p=0.883). Qualitative accounts described recovery as restored capacity to work, manage relationships, care for children, and respond to hardship despite material constraints. Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that group interpersonal psychotherapy may improve outcomes beyond depressive symptoms, although household welfare findings were less consistent. Larger trials with independent outcome assessment and longer follow-up are needed. Trial registration: The trial was retrospectively registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202606549854263) on 29 June 2026.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.2%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.2%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.2%
4
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
5
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.7%
6
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
8
BMJ Paediatrics Open
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
10
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
14
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Public Health in Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
16
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
19
International Journal of Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
20
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.2%
22
Public Health
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
23
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
24
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Systematic Reviews
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
26
The British Journal of Psychiatry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%