A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single-ascending-dose study to identify a non-hallucinogenic dose of psilocybin in healthy adults.
Levy-Cooperman, N.; Sellers, E.; Glue, P.; Szeto, I.; Brown, D.; Jarecki-Smith, J.; Tyler, W. J.; McDonnell, M. B.
Show abstract
Psilocybin shows therapeutic promise for several psychiatric disorders, but the acute perceptual and cognitive alterations produced by conventional doses (10-25 mg) require in-clinic supervision, which limits scalability. Whether the therapeutically relevant pharmacology of psilocybin can be separated from its hallucinogenic activity remains unresolved. To address this gap, we conducted a Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study to characterize the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of low doses of psilocybin. Fifty-six healthy adults received a single oral dose of psilocybin (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 or 4.0 mg) or matching placebo across seven sequential cohorts, with each dose escalation reviewed by a Drug Safety Review Committee. All participants completed the study with no serious adverse events or discontinuations. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable to placebo and most prominently arose as somnolence. Plasma psilocin appeared rapidly with a median time to maximum concentration < 1 h with dose-proportional exposure and a short terminal half-life. Subjective drug effects were dose-related and became distinguishable from placebo at doses at or below 2.5 mg. Peak subjective ratings increased with dose, while any signs of hallucinations or altered-states scores remained low and not different than placebo. Psychophysiological engagement was confirmed by a clear dose-dependent pupillary dilation while cognitive performance (attention, vigilance, working memory, impulse control) showed no dose-dependent decrement and state anxiety did not increase at any dose. These findings indicate that the perceptible pharmacology of psilocybin can be dissociated from significant perceptual alterations and cognitive impairment at low doses. They further support controlled investigations in outpatient Phase 2 studies evaluating the safety and feasibility of repeated, self-administered low-dose psilocybin. ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT07710027
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- How does it feel to be on psilocybin? Dose-response relationships of subjective experiences in humans. 94%
- Drug-drug interactions between classic psychedelics and psychoactive drugs: a systematic review 91%
- Associations of antidepressants and antipsychotics with lipid parameters: Do CYP2D6 / CYP2C19 genes play a role? A UK population-based study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of the Neutral CB1 Receptor Antagonist AM6527 on Spontaneous, Consummatory, and Motivated Behavior in Mice 92%
- The acute effects of cannabidiol on emotional processing and anxiety: a neurocognitive imaging study 92%
- Drug-Drug interactions between COVID-19 treatments and antipsychotics drugs: integrated evidence from 4 databases and a systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A large Australian longitudinal cohort registry demonstrates sustained safety and efficacy of oral medicinal cannabis for at least two years 94%
- Clinical safety and pharmacokinetics of a novel oral niclosamide formulation compared with marketed niclosamide chewing tablets in healthy volunteers: a three-part randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 93%
- A Multi-Centre, Tolerability Study of a Cannabidiol-enriched Cannabis Herbal Extract for Chronic Headaches in Adolescents: the CAN-CHA Protocol 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.