Back

Intimate Partner Violence and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Gaps

Glavas, D.; Makoudjou, M. A.; Melis, G.; Bernardele, L.; Paolocci, N.; Scarpa, M.; Agrimi, J.; Spolverato, G.

2026-07-16 oncology
10.64898/2026.07.16.26358254 medRxiv
Show abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Despite its high prevalence and established impact on women's health, the long-term biological effects of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) remain poorly understood. In particular, its potential role in increasing cancer risk has received limited attention. This review examines whether IPV may be associated with elevated cancer risk in women. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines to evaluate whether IPV may be associated with cancer risk. Eligible studies included adult women ([≥]18 years) with documented IPV exposure and cancer or precancerous outcomes. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published from 2000 to 2025. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on longitudinal studies reporting adjusted risk estimates. Results: Thirteen studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, but only two met criteria for meta-analysis, both reporting on cervical cancer. The pooled odds ratio was 3.00 (95% CI: 2.05 - 4.38; I2 = 0%). A separate pooled prevalence analysis of six retrospective studies showed that 32.2% of women with cancer reported a lifetime history of IPV. Study quality ranged from low to high. Conclusions: This review underscores the limited and heterogeneous nature of the existing evidence on IPV as a potential cancer risk factor. While preliminary findings suggest a possible association, particularly with cervical cancer, the scarcity of high-quality longitudinal studies and the methodological variability in the studies reviewed prevent definitive conclusions regarding causal linkage. Further research, particularly prospective and mechanistic studies, is needed to clarify the relationship between IPV and oncogenesis across different cancer types and to identify underlying biological pathways.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.4%
2
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.2%
3
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.7%
5
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.4%
6
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
10
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
12
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
13
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.6%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.2%
16
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.0%
21
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
25
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%