Bowel Irrigation Questionnaire Development of a Patient-Reported Experience Measure to assess the user experience of Transanal Irrigation
Farrow, E.; Balachandran, R.; Embleton, R.; Krogh, K.; Vollebregt, P. F.; Cornish, J.; Christensen, P.
Show abstract
Aims To develop the Bowel Irrigation Questionnaire (BIQ), a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) designed to assess the user experience of transanal irrigation (TAI). Methods Statements were generated through literature review and qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and product users. Statements were rated on a 6-point content validity index scale through an international three-round online Delphi survey by 20 expert panel members. Consensus attainment was defined based on percentage agreement, statements which did not meet consensus were discussed at a final international online consensus meeting. The content validity of the PREM was evaluated through cognitive interviews and the Questionnaire on Questionnaires (QQ-10). Reliability was assessed using a test-retest design, where users completed the BIQ on two occasions one week apart. Results 215 statements were generated from 9 multi-disciplinary qualitative interviews and literature review. Statements were refined to reduce repetition and ensure clarity. 73 statements grouped into 11 domains were reviewed through the Delphi survey. Following the Delphi survey and clinical consensus meeting, the preliminary BIQ consisted of 15 items. Six cognitive interviews were conducted, resulting in a finalised BIQ of 16 items. 32 product users completed both the QQ-10 and test-retest study, the results of which demonstrated good content validity and temporal stability respectively. Conclusions The Bowel Irrigation Questionnaire is a novel PREM designed to assess the user experience of TAI in both clinical and research settings. The instrument demonstrates good validity, acceptability and temporal stability, supporting its use as a reliable measure of patient experience.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 93%
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 92%
- Virtual reality as a strategy for intra-operatory anxiolysis and pharmacological sparing in patients undergoing breast surgeries: the V-RAPS randomized controlled trial protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 91%
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 90%
- Pilot Feasibility Clinical Trial of Virtual Reality for Pain Management During Repeated Pediatric Laser Procedures: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wearable Sensing in Eating Episode Monitoring: An Updated Systematic Review Protocol 92%
- Doctors of chiropractic working with or within integrated health care delivery systems: a scoping review protocol 92%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Advancing the Safe Motherhood Initiative: a qualitative and sentiment analysis of local physician’s perspectives on antibiotic self-medication during pregnancy in a low- and middle-income country 92%
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 92%
- Acceptability of fixed-dose combination treatments for hypertension in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 90%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): Protocol of a cluster randomised controlled equivalence trial of prescribing policy to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension. 90%
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.