Back

Citrulline and Faecal Elastase 1 as a Combined Diagnostic Biomarker for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Niazi, U.; Roberts, C. A.; McDonnell, D.; Goss, V. M.; Afolabi, P. R.; Swann, J. R.; Byrne, C. D.; Griffiths, G. O.; Hamady, Z. Z.

2026-07-19 oncology
10.64898/2026.07.16.26358209 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is critical. While faecal elastase-1 (FE-1) is a standard clinical marker for pancreatic function, its diagnostic accuracy for malignancy is limited. We sought to identify plasma metabolites that enhance FE-1 performance in symptomatic "at-risk" patients. Methods: Using the DEPEND cohort (CRUK C45617/A29908), plasma metabolomics was performed on patients with resectable PDAC (n=23) and healthy volunteers (n=24). Predictive modelling included feature selection and cross-validation, with further validation in an independent external cohort. Results: Citrulline was identified as significantly depleted in PDAC patients across discovery and validation cohorts. In isolation, Citrulline achieved an AUC of 0.86 (internal) and 0.88 (external validation). Standalone FE-1 demonstrated an AUC of 0.67. However, combining Citrulline and FE-1 significantly improved diagnostic performance, achieving a combined AUC of 0.96. Stratification revealed distinct metabolomic signatures associated with poorly differentiated tumours, suggesting a link to histological grade. Conclusions: Integrating Citrulline with FE-1 testing substantially improves PDAC detection in symptomatic patients. This non-invasive panel offers high diagnostic potential, though prospective validation is required to establish clinical cut-offs for routine practice.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.4%
4
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
Gut
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.5%
7
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
8
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
12
American Journal of Gastroenterology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
17
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
20
Molecular Cancer
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.2%
22
Metabolomics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
Gastroenterology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
25
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
26
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
27
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
30
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.9%