Back

Transient Apical Sparing in Hypertensive Heart Disease Explained by Laplace's Law

Hwang, I.-C.; Kim, H. M.; Jang, Y.; Bak, M.; Park, J.; Jeon, J.; Lee, S.-A.; Choi, H.-M.; Yoon, Y. E.; Cho, G.-Y.

2026-07-19 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.07.16.26358114 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Apical sparing of left ventricular longitudinal strain (LS) is an echocardiographic clue to cardiac amyloidosis but may also occur in hypertensive heart disease (HHD). Objectives: To determine whether apical sparing in HHD is associated with regional left ventricular wall stress estimated according to Laplace's law. Methods: We retrospectively studied 1,559 patients with HHD, 47 with light-chain cardiac amyloidosis (ALCA), and 409 normotensive controls. Artificial intelligence-assisted echocardiography quantified segmental LS, wall thickness, and cavity radius at the basal, midventricular, and apical levels. Wall stress was estimated as mean blood pressure (MBP) x radius/(2 x wall thickness). Apical sparing was defined as a relative regional strain ratio (RRSR)[&ge;]1.0. Results: Apical sparing was present in 14 patients with HHD (0.9%), 13 with ALCA (27.7%), and no controls. Among HHD patients with apical sparing, RRSR decreased from 1.11{+/-}0.13 to 0.72{+/-}0.10 after antihypertensive treatment (P<0.001), accompanied by reduced wall stress and improved basal and midventricular LS, with resolution of apical sparing in all 14 patients. In the overall HHD cohort, changes in MBP and left ventricular mass index were independently associated with changes in RRSR. In an exploratory analysis of HHD patients with apical sparing, a reduction in basal wall stress was associated with a reduction in RRSR ({beta}=0.267 for {bigtriangleup}RRSRx100, 95% CI 0.023-0.511; P=0.036). In ALCA, favorable hematologic response was the only determinant of RRSR reduction. Conclusions: Apical sparing in HHD was uncommon but reversible and may represent a load-sensitive deformation pattern associated with regional wall stress, consistent with Laplace's law.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.7%
3
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.8%
4
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.6%
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
7
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
9
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
10
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
11
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
18
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
21
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
22
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
International Journal of Cardiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
24
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
29
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%