Multicenter self-supervised computational pathology identifies prognostic histomorphological phenotypes in colorectal cancer
Heilijgers, F.; Le, H. A.; Coudray, N.; Karimkhan, A.; Chen, D.; Peeters, K. C. M. J.; Hacking, S.; Mesker, W. E.; Tsirigos, A.; UNITED collaboration,
Show abstract
H&E whole-slide images capture prognostic information encoded in tumor morphology and the surrounding microenvironment, but these signals remain difficult to extract and interpret at scale. Here, we developed a self-supervised computational pathology framework to predict disease-free survival in colorectal cancer and link model-derived risk to interpretable histomorphology and spatial tumor biology. Using a multicenter developmental cohort spanning colorectal adenomas and invasive colorectal cancer, we trained HPL-PanColon, a self-supervised representation model, to extract tile-level embeddings and identify recurrent histomorphological phenotype clusters across the adenoma-carcinoma spectrum. Compared with general-purpose pathology foundation models, HPL-PanColon yielded representations with reduced institution- and dataset-specific batch effects. We then applied HPL-PanColon to a global survival cohort of 1,024 colorectal cancer patients in a leave-one-institution-out framework, using tile embeddings to train an attention-based survival model and derive the Colon Histomorphology Prognostic Score (CHiPS). CHiPS stratified patients by disease-free survival and provided complementary prognostic information to a UICC TNM-informed clinicopathological model, increasing the c-index from 0.683 to 0.706. Integrating model attention with phenotype assignments traced CHiPS-associated risk to pathologist-recognizable tissue patterns, with high-risk regions enriched for desmoplastic, stromal, and fibroinflammatory morphologies and low-risk regions reflecting tumor-rich epithelial glandular patterns. Spatial transcriptomic analysis further linked high-risk morphologies to fibroblastic, perivascular, myofibroblastic, and immune-reactive tumor microenvironment programs, while low-risk morphologies mapped to epithelial and tumor-enriched regions. These findings establish a scalable framework for interpretable histology-based prognosis and spatial biological discovery in colorectal cancer.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping and modeling human colorectal carcinoma interactions with the tumor microenvironment 96%
- Integrative spatial omics reveals distinct tumor-promoting multicellular niches and immunosuppressive mechanisms in Black American and White American patients with TNBC 95%
- Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals the Effects of Chemotherapy on Human Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and its Tumor Microenvironment 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stratification Of Chemotherapy-Treated Stage III Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Multiplexed Imaging And Single Cell Analysis Of T Cell Populations 94%
- Artificial intelligence-driven morphology-based enrichment of malignant cells from body fluid 92%
- Detection of prostate cancer in 3D pathology datasets via generative immunolabeling 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Myeloid cell-associated resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in urothelial cancer revealed through bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing 96%
- Single cell genomic characterization reveals the cellular reprogramming of the gastric tumor microenvironment 95%
- The genomic landscape of early stage ovarian high grade serous carcinoma 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-Cell Spatial Proteomics Analyses of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Reveal Tumor Heterogeneity and Immune Architectures Associated with Clinical Outcome 95%
- Multimodal single-cell profiling reveals cancer crosstalk between macrophages and stromal cells in poor prognostic cholangiocarcinoma patients. 95%
- Predicting the Tumor Microenvironment Composition and Immunotherapy Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer from Digital Histopathology Images 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.