Conditional Deletion of All Neurexins Defines Diversity of Essential Synaptic Organizer Functions for Neurexins
Jiang, M.; Li, Y.; Artyukhova, M.; Zhang, L.; Luo, S.; Zhan, W.; Zhang, B.; Gokce, O.; Sudhof, T. C.
Show abstract
Presynaptic neurexins are key regulators of synapse properties that arguably represent the best-studied synaptic adhesion molecules. Despite thousands of papers, however, no direct comparison of overall neurexin functions in different types of synapses is available. A decade ago, we provided such an analysis but we recently retracted this paper because four images contained microduplications that, although without discernible impact on the papers conclusions, could not be corrected. As a result, the scientific community lost access to primary data that established the fundamental principle that neurexins perform profound but distinct functions in different types of synapses. In the present study, we have therefore reanalyzed the original raw data and expanded their conclusions with new experiments to document in a single study the basic contributions of neurexins to different synapses. Using triple conditional knockout mice that target all neurexins except for Neurexin-1{gamma} and applying neuron-specific manipulations combined with slice electrophysiology, two-photon Ca2+ imaging and immunohistochemistry, we focussed on excitatory climbing-fiber synapses in the cerebellum and on inhibitory synapses formed by parvalbumin-or somatostatin-positive neurons in the cerebellum, hippocampus, and medial prefrontal cortex. Our results show that pan-neurexin deletions produce dramatically different phenotypes in synapses, ranging from modest to massive impairments in synapse assembly (climbing-fiber and parvalbumin-positive synapses) to severe but selective decreases in presynaptic action potential-induced Ca2+-transients (somatostatin-positive synapses). Thus, neurexins perform powerful but distinct context-dependent roles in different synapses that shape the brains circuits. Significance StatementNeurexins are abundant presynaptic adhesion molecules expressed from three genes in more than a thousand splice variants. Although neurexins are well studied, no analysis that compares neurexin deletions in multiple types of synapses is currently available. Here, we provide such an analysis by examining triple conditional knockout mice that delete all neurexins except for Neurexin-1{gamma}. Using neuron-specific manipulations combined with slice electrophysiology, two-photon Ca2+ imaging and immunohistochemistry, we show that pan-neurexin deletions produce distinct phenotypes in different synapses, ranging from impairments in synapse assembly (climbing-fiber and parvalbumin-positive cortical synapses) to severe selective decreases in presynaptic action potential-induced Ca2+-transients (somatostatin-positive cortical synapses). Our data reveal context-dependent distinct functions of neurexins in different synapses whose properties shape the input-output relations of neural circuits.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Endopiriform neurons projecting to ventral CA1 are a critical node for recognition memory 97%
- Clathrin-independent endocytic retrieval of SV proteins mediated by the clathrin adaptor AP-2 at mammalian central synapses 97%
- Heterozygosity for neurodevelopmental disorder-associated TRIO variants yields distinct deficits in behavior, neuronal development, and synaptic transmission in mice. 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- A silent Kv channel subunit shapes PV neuron action potential waveform and short-term synaptic plasticity during high-frequency firing 97%
- The Relationship between Birth Timing, Circuit Wiring, and Physiological ResponseProperties of Cerebellar Granule Cells 97%
- All-or-none disconnection of pyramidal inputs onto parvalbumin-positive interneurons gates ocular dominance plasticity 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.