Event-Centered Prediction: How Future Interaction Points Shape Human Anticipation of Motion
Aparicio-Rodriguez, G.; Martin-Fernandez, T.; Manubens, P.; Sanchez-Jimenez, A.; Calvo-Tapia, C.; Villacorta-Atienza, J. A.
Show abstract
Prediction in dynamic situations, in which relevant elements evolve over time, is a fundamental cognitive function. The brain relies on specialized predictive mechanisms, including time compaction, a process that supports dynamic processing by embedding temporal information into space and transforming future interactions into salient spatial representations. Here we investigated how future interactions are salient during dynamic events and how this salience shapes behavior. Participants performed a visuomotor prediction task in which they estimated the future trajectory of a moving object after observing only the initial portion of its motion, while another object was simultaneously present and could generate either interactive (collision) or non-interactive (crossing) dynamics. Although accurate performance required extrapolating motion solely from kinematic information, participants predictions were systematically biased toward locations associated with future interactions. Prediction accuracy was reduced in situations involving potential future interactions compared to non-interactive dynamics. Importantly, participants consistently responded closer to predicted interaction points, even when this strategy did not improve accuracy or trajectory extrapolation. Substantial inter-individual variability was observed, revealing conservative and risk-taking predictive strategies with systematic group differences. When participants were explicitly instructed to improve performance, overall accuracy improved only marginally, while predictive behavior shifted toward greater reliance on interaction-related locations, particularly among those who had not already adopted this strategy. We propose that this interaction-driven bias reflects a core property of time compaction, supporting the idea that predictive cognition relies on future interactions as stable reference points under dynamic uncertainty.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An immersive first-person navigation task for abstract knowledge acquisition 96%
- Implicit and explicit learning of Bayesian priors differently impacts bias during perceptual decision-making 95%
- Change point detection with multiple alternatives reveals parallel evaluation of the same stream of evidence along distinct timescales 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive attenuation of touch and tactile gating are distinct perceptual phenomena 95%
- Belief updating in decision-variable space: past decisions with finer granularity attract future ones more strongly 95%
- Predictions of bimanual self-touch determine the temporal tuning of somatosensory perception 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.