Back

Bridging surveillance gaps in dengue: a hierarchical model integrating mixed data sources for transmission estimation and vaccine targeting

Djaafara, B. A.; Elyazar, I. R.; Yosephine, P.; Surya, A.; Silalahi, F. S.; Handito, A.; Thohir, B.; Aryani, D.; Gunawan, D.; Nisa, A. K.; Prianto, E.; Samad, I.; Cook, A. R.; Huang, A. T.; Clapham, H. E.; Bhatt, S.; Mishra, S.

2026-07-17 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.07.15.26358208 medRxiv
Show abstract

Estimating dengue force of infection (FOI) is essential for understanding transmission dynamics and targeting intervention programmes, yet surveillance data in endemic settings required for estimations are often incomplete, with varying formats. We developed a Bayesian hierarchical catalytic model that jointly fits age-stratified case data, aggregate case data, and seroprevalence surveys within a single framework, incorporating external covariates to improve parameter identifiability. Synthetic validation showed that covariates alone recovered accurate FOI point estimates even when most districts contributed only aggregate data, but did so with poorly calibrated uncertainty; anchoring the model with a single seroprevalence survey was necessary to bring credible interval coverage close to nominal. Applied to 128 districts across Java and Bali, Indonesia (2016-2024), the model revealed substantial spatial heterogeneity in FOI and reporting rates. Many districts in Java exceeded the WHO-suggested seroprevalence threshold for vaccine introduction, yet were classified as low-priority when using reported incidence as prioritisation criterion, particularly in areas with weak surveillance. Model-based seroprevalence estimation, integrating multiple data sources, offers a more consistent basis for identifying high-priority districts for vaccine introduction, and is less susceptible to surveillance bias than reported incidence.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
15.0%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.8%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.5%
7
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.6%
10
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
12
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
13
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.0%
22
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
25
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%