Back

Modeling effect of hypertension control on death, incidence of atrial fibrillation and economic impact to Medicare and hospitals.

Williams, J.; Mencer, N.; Mak, W. Y.; Dalle Luche, G.; Dundovic, S.

2026-07-17 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.07.15.26358198 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Hypertension is a major modifiable risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), yet blood pressure (BP) control remains suboptimal in older U.S. adults. Objectives This study evaluated how improve systolic BP (SBP) control could affect incident AF, downstream AF ablation demand, Medicare savings, and hospital revenue. Methods A population-based modelling framework was developed to estimate mortality and incident AF hazards across SBP strata: <120, 120-139, 140-159, and ?160 mm/Hg. AF incidence in the SBP <120 mmHg group was set at 2.2 per 1,000 person-year, with hazard ratios of 1.17, 1.42 and 1.64 applied to higher SBP strata. We assumed 25% of incident AF patients would undergo ablation, with a 7.2% complication rate. AF prevalence was projected to increase by 4.6% annually over 10 years. Medicare savings and hospital revenue foregone were estimated under varying procedure cost and contribution-margin assumptions. Results Higher SBP was associated with greater hazards of death and incident AF. Improved SBP control reduced projected AF incidence and ablation demand. Over 10 years, cumulative Medicare savings were projected at $8.7B-$10.9B across the full modelled population. However, reduced ablation volume translated into hospital revenue foregone, ranging from $75M to $377M in the first year, and approximately $1.03B-$5.2B cumulatively over 10 years. Conclusions Improved SBP control may reduce AF incidence, prevent avoidable invasive ablation procedures, relieve pressure on surgical waitlists, and generate substantial Medicare savings. However, these benefits may reduce hospital procedural revenue, highlighting a misalignment between prevention-oriented care and fee-for-service reimbursement incentives.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.6%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.5%
3
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
4
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
6
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.8%
8
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
9
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
10
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
12
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
13
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
14
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
15
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
16
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Biometrics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
30
Journal of General Internal Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%