Back

In Silico Trial Simulation with Artificial Intelligence-Generated Synthetic Control Cohorts Reproduces Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Kumar Reddy, K.; Hahn, W.; Winter, S.; Roellig, C.; Mueller-Tidow, C.; Serve, H.; Baldus, C. D.; Fransecky, L.; Schliemann, C.; Burchert, A.; Schaefer-Eckart, K.; Kaufmann, M.; Schetelig, J.; Bornhaeuser, M.; Middeke, J. M.; Eckardt, J.-N.

2026-07-16 health informatics
10.64898/2026.07.15.26358123 medRxiv
Show abstract

Rising costs, slow accrual and molecular substratification of cancers necessitate novel clinical trial designs. We demonstrate that artificial intelligence-generated synthetic patients can replace real controls to reproduce results of the SORAML trial. Using external multimodal data from 1,377 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients from previous trials and a real-world registry, we fine-tuned a tabular foundation model to generate synthetic patients, reproducing clinical and genetic features and outcome associations. Synthetic patients were then matched to the original SORAML intervention group using Cox risk scores, replacing the original control and reproducing the original trial result with near-identical median event-free survival (EFS) and treatment effect (original hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95%-confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.87, p=0.004; with synthetic control HR 0.66, 95%-CI 0.48-0.90, p=0.009). Our findings demonstrate that AI-generated synthetic patients can serve as statistically rigorous controls supporting novel trial designs.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.8%
2
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.2%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.9%
6
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
7
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.1%
8
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
14
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
24
npj Antimicrobials and Resistance
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Med
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%