Back

Implementation of a standardized Video-based Asynchronous Neurological Examination (VANE) in a multi-center observational study of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD related dementias

Noble, J. M.; Nadkarni, N. K.; Martinez, D.; Temprosa, M.; Bowers, A.; Carmichael, O.; Doherty, L.; Febres, G. J.; Sanchez, D. L.; Goldberg, T. E.; Sherif, H.; Shah, V.; Luchsinger, J. A.; DPP Research Group,

2026-07-17 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.07.15.26357456 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: The Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS) is an established cohort of aging persons with pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes with 25 years of median follow-up. In 2022 DPPOS added Alzheimer's disease (AD), and AD related dementias (ADRD) phenotyping using the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set (UDSv3), which included a standardized neurological examination across 25 clinical sites, administered by clinical staff and interpreted centrally by clinicians. Methods: A DPPOS video-based asynchronous neurological examination (DPPOS-VANE) was developed iteratively through consensus from research clinicians and staff feedback to harmonize with UDSv3 to identify common neurological diagnoses aside from dementia including diabetic cranial neuropathies, stroke and parkinsonism. DPPOS-VANE was designed to be conducted without direct participant contact by the examiner, reproducible, and independent of clinical skills of PCs. An iPad camera recorded the video exam, comprised of assessments of extraocular and facial movements, visual fields, speech, gross motor strength, pronator drift, praxis and parkinsonism. A 10-minute training video demonstrated the examination step-by-step with scripts and instructions in English and Spanish. Site-specific performance review, feedback, and staff certification preceded central reading of video recordings by physicians. After two years of implementation, 1286 DPPOS-VANEs led to 1284 examination reviews. Of these, 1204 (93%) were completed by having the examiner follow the standard script. Overall, 1237 examinations (96%) were delivered as planned, 41 (3%) had minor errors but were still usable, and 6 (0.4%) had major deviations in exam technique; two additional recorded evaluations were not usable as recorded videos were inaccessible due to technical errors. Each examination was completed within 10-15 minutes. Each site on average completed 51.4 examinations (range 14-92). Discussion: Engaging 55 research staff across 25 sites and 3 physician-reviewers, this study is the first to demonstrate feasibility of a VANE as an efficient neurological examination model enabled by commonly used devices. Such a multisite standardized VANE represents a novel paradigm for large epidemiological studies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.0%
3
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.8%
5
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
6
BMC Geriatrics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.1%
8
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
10
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
11
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
16
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
22
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
npj Aging
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%