Back

Articulatory timing and form support distinct neural benefits during audiovisual speech

Nidiffer, A.; O'Sullivan, A.; Lalor, E. C.

2026-07-15 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.14.738583 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In noisy environments, visible speech articulations improve listening comprehension. The benefit derives from several sources, including articulatory timing and shape. Recent research has shown that visual cortex encodes a categorical representation of articulatory features and that visual speech can benefit both acoustic and phonetic feature processing separately. The present study advances the hypothesis that the shape of the articulators specifically influences the categorization of auditory speech in terms of its phonetic features. We tested this by linearly modeling electroencephalographic responses to natural, continuous speech (in noise) in terms of the acoustic and articulatory features of the speech. We compared the performance of these models in conditions where the speech was accompanied by a natural video of the speaker with their mouth visible, and a video where their mouth was covered by a dynamic ellipse obscuring articulatory shape but preserving dynamics. The dynamic mask reduced comprehension, neural processing of phonetic features, the associated multisensory benefits, and indices of visual-only linguistic processing over occipital scalp. Our findings support substantial visual involvement in speech comprehension, derived largely from the shape of the articulators. They also corroborate several proposals involving audiovisual speech processing hierarchy and the nature of the information contained in visible speech. HighlightsO_LIVisual speech provides at least two forms of information to enhance acoustic speech processing: redundant temporal dynamics and complementary articulatory information C_LIO_LICovering the mouth with a dynamic mask preserves horizontal and vertical lip movement information, but largely removes articulatory detail C_LIO_LIVisual speech with a mask preserves some general multisensory benefits but removes visual linguistic information and its ability to enhance auditory processing at the level of phonetic features. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
14.7%
2
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.5%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.1%
4
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.3%
6
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
7
Hearing Research
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
10
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
12
Trends in Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.6%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
15
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
18
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
19
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
20
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.5%
22
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
24
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
26
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Neurobiology of Language
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%
30
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%