Back

Alcohol Cues Invigorate Aversion-Resistant Alcohol Drinking

Bauer, M. R.; Richard, J. M.

2026-07-20 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.14.738545 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAlcohol use disorder is characterized by continued alcohol use despite negative consequences, also known as aversion-resistant drinking. Alcohol related cues can invigorate motivation to seek and consume alcohol. It is currently unknown whether alcohol related cues can invigorate drinking despite negative consequences. Materials and MethodsLong-Evans rats were trained in a discriminative stimulus (DS) task with cues predicting the available of alcohol reward. They were then tested in the task for aversion-resistant drinking by measuring consumption of alcohol adulterated with increasing concentrations of quinine. As a control for an environment free of reward-related cues, rats were also tested for aversion-resistant drinking in the home cage. ResultsWe found that rats displayed robust aversion-resistant drinking in the DS task. When we compared alcohol consumption in the task with home cage consumption, we found that rats were more aversion-resistant in the task than in the home cage. We also found that individual differences in aversion-resistant drinking were correlated within behavioral context (i.e. home cage or DS task) but not between the home cage and the DS task. ConclusionsWe found that aversion-resistant drinking is invigorated during cue-induced alcohol seeking relative to free drinking without explicit cues. Home cage quinine-sensitivity is unrelated to quinine-sensitivity in the presence of cues. This suggests that cues motivate drinking despite negative consequences in a way that is unique from aversion-resistance driven by drinking history. While many behavioral measures use cues and ultimately test aversion-resistant drinking, this is the first explicit test of cue-evoked aversion-resistant drinking.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.