Deep learning framework for kinematic event detection and stimulation decoding in primate reaching behavior
Markus, A.; Sinha, N.; Prut, Y.; Goldberger, J.
Show abstract
Accurate analysis of motor behavior requires the reliable detection of ongoing kinematic events and a granular characterization of the changes in motor output that occur in response to neural impairments. This article describes a deep learning framework based on bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) networks developed to analyze single-trial three-dimensional reaching trajectories recorded from two non-human primates. The framework was used to detect movement onset and corrective turning points, and to differentiate control from the perturbed trials during which cerebellar output was blocked. This approach was compared to manually annotated data. Only small within-animal errors in detecting movement onset times were observed (8.92 {+/-} 2.03 ms and 9.56 {+/-} 3.64 ms for the two monkeys). These errors were significantly smaller (p < 0.001) than those obtained using conventional velocity-threshold methods. Transferring the same detection algorithm from one animal to the other resulted in large errors because the reconstructed workspaces were represented in different coordinate frames. Orthogonal Procrustes alignment substantially reduced the between-animal event-detection errors, and brought performance closer to the within-animal range. Decoding of the perturbed vs. the control trials achieved above-chance levels of accuracy for each animal (accuracies of 71.0% and 61.9% respectively). However, the between-animal generalization was poor (near chance level) and was not improved by geometric alignment. These findings suggest that geometric alignment can support the transfer of shared kinematic event structure between animals, but that perturbation-related changes in movements reflect animal-specific compensatory strategies which cannot be generalized.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct neural representations during a brain-machine interface and manual reaching task in motor cortex, prefrontal cortex, and striatum 96%
- Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaption along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches 95%
- External error attribution dampens efferent-basedpredictions but not proprioceptive changes in handlocalization 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unsupervised, piecewise linear decoding enables an accurate prediction of muscle activity in a multi-task brain computer interface 96%
- A Versatile Robotic Platform For The Design Of Natural, Three-Dimensional Reaching And Grasping Tasks In Monkeys 95%
- Less is more: selection from a small set of options improves BCI velocity control 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Separability of Human Motor Memories during Reaching Adaptation with Force Cues 95%
- The spinal cord facilitates cerebellar upper limb motor learning and control; inputs from neuromusculoskeletal simulation 94%
- Discovering individual-specific gait signatures from data-driven models of neuromechanical dynamics 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.