Back

Pseudotyped virus-based platform and structural analysis reveal potential cross-reactivity sites between influenza C and D viruses

Marotta, M. G.; Rowles-Khalid, S.; Mayora Neto, M.; Daly, J. M.; van Diemen, P. M.; Everett, H. E.; Montomoli, E.; Trombetta, C. M.; Temperton, N. J.; da Costa, K.

2026-07-20 immunology
10.64898/2026.07.14.738474 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Influenza C (ICV) and influenza D (IDV) viruses belong to the Orthomyxoviridae family and are classified in the genera Gammainfluenzavirus and Deltainfluenzavirus, respectively. Although the main reservoir of ICV is humans, IDV is mainly found in cattle. To date, the zoonotic potential of IDV has not been fully elucidated. ICV and IDV share about 50% homology at the genetic level, and both express hemagglutinin esterase fusion (HEF) glycoproteins on the surface for the dual purpose of binding the receptor and releasing new virions. Using pseudotyped viruses (PVs) in a pseudotyped virus-based microneutralisation assay (pMN), some bovine serum samples showed strong neutralisation of both ICV and IDV. In silico analyses were performed to explore the molecular basis of this phenomenon. HEF structures were recovered from the Protein Data Bank, epitopes were predicted using BepiPred, and sialic acid receptor docking was evaluated with HDOCK. Five potential epitopes were selected, and mutual substitutions of amino acid residues were introduced to generate mutant ICV and IDV HEFs and corresponding PVs. Although only mutant IDV PVs were successfully produced, a reference ICV antiserum showed high neutralising activity against one construct, indicating the exposure of an ICV-like antigenic site within the IDV framework. Herein we provide evidence consistent with the existence of antigenic sites shared between ICV and IDV, which could be exploited for cross-protective vaccine design, through integrated computational and experimental investigations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.