A Multi-Omics Framework Reveals Phosphorylation-Dependent Control of Protein Interactions
Ogata, K.; Matabaro, E.; Aarts, E.; Jänes, J.; Ishihama, Y.; Beltrao, P.
Show abstract
Protein phosphorylation regulates nearly every cellular process, yet most of the hundreds of thousands of human phosphosites remain functionally uncharacterized. Rather than prioritising phosphosites by conservation or structural features, here we use the abundance of an interaction partner as a readout of whether a phosphosite affects that interaction. This idea exploits the fact that subunits of stable complexes are often degraded when unbound. Here, we apply a nested linear regression model to pan-cancer data from 1,006 tumours, while controlling for transcriptional and other covariates. We identified 6,160 associations between 3,038 phosphosites and the abundance of interacting proteins, including several known interaction-regulating sites. Mapping these onto AlphaFold-predicted complexes placed 239 sites at interaction interfaces, while another 402 were linked to compartment-specific localisation, indicating that phosphorylation can also tune interactions by relocating proteins between compartments. Affinity-purification mass spectrometry of NKAP and NUF2 phosphosite mutants experimentally supported some of these predictions. Together, this framework reveals a widespread coupling between phosphorylation and interaction-dependent protein abundance and provides a prioritized, structure-informed resource for characterizing the human phosphoproteome
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic proteomic and phosphoproteomic atlas of corticostriatal axon neurodevelopment 95%
- PDZ-directed substrate recruitment is the primary determinant of specific 4E-BP1dephosphorylation by PP1-Neurabin 95%
- A Bidirectional Switch in the Shank3 Phosphorylation State Biases Synapses toward Up or Down Scaling 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.