Back

Where species distribution models fail under occurrence-data contamination: calibration error concentrates at stream-network headwaters

Miok, K.; Laza, A. V.; Skrlj, B.; Robnik-Sikonja, M.; Parvulescu, L.

2026-07-15 ecology
10.64898/2026.07.14.738364 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Species distribution models (SDMs) increasingly inform conservation and biosecurity decisions in freshwater systems, where the reliability of its uncertainty estimates matters as much as its point predictions. Ensemble SDMs derive prediction intervals from across-replicate variance, but this variance captures systematic error only when replicates disagree about it, an assumption that fails when training data are contaminated with low-accuracy records, the norm in citizen-science datasets. Whether this failure is spatially uniform or concentrates in identifiable parts of a range is unknown. Using a panel of European freshwater crayfish spanning native headwater-associated species and invasive lowland colonizers, we show that contamination-induced calibration failure is strongly spatially structured: it concentrates at stream-network headwaters, the topological tops of the network, where upstream-aggregated predictors are structurally undefined, and scales with contamination severity, replicated across four species and both dominant ensemble protocols (replicate and consensus). The failure is driven by upward prediction bias, not by intervals failing to widen: contaminated ensembles overpredict suitability in headwaters, and because the bias is shared across ensemble members, the intervals do not flag it. This is a conservation-relevant blind spot, because headwaters are both refugia for threatened native crayfish and front lines for invasion; an SDM that silently overpredicts suitability there misdirects survey and management effort toward the segments where its predictions are least trustworthy. Standard leave-one-basin-out conformal calibration, the recommended panel-wide remedy, repairs marginal coverage but leaves headwaters undercovered, because a single calibration threshold is dominated by the abundant non-headwater segments. A group-conditional (Mondrian) variant, calibrating the two populations separately, restores reliable coverage in both at no extra cost and reallocates width where it is needed. We recommend network-position-stratified calibration as a default for ensemble SDMs in dendritic freshwater systems.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.7%
3
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.1%
5
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
6
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
7
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.2%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
11
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.1%
13
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
17
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
19
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.4%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
21
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
24
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
26
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%