Back

Structural Composition Enables Very Fast Learning

Riveland, R.; Pouget, A.; Latham, P.

2026-07-15 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.14.738142 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWThere is a gap between neuroscientific theories of learning and the speed of learning observed in many experiments. Since the Cognitive Revolution of the 1950s, compositionality has played a central role in efforts to bridge this gap. Roughly, a compositional system is one where distinct modules are combined according to a set of rules in order to accomplish complex tasks. Recently, significant progress has been made in understanding the emergence of modules in both biological and artificial neural systems. How, and under what conditions, the rules of module recombination are represented in these systems remains an open question. Here we present a neural model that can leverage these rules to dramatically speed up learning. We first show that when faced with multiple tasks which share subcomponents, models learn a low-dimensional representation that captures how subcomponents are reused across the task set. These low-dimensional spaces encode the structure that governs how modules should be recombined. Restricting learning to these subspaces greatly reduces the amount of experience needed to acquire a novel task, even when learning from reinforcement on single trials. In some cases, we can leverage the geometric regularities of these representations to reduce learning to a form of hypothesis testing over a small set of discrete points. Finally, we use this theory to model both behavioral and neural data from non-human primates performing a compositional task, and show that key features in this data are consistent with a model in which exploration during learning is restricted to these low-dimensional spaces. Overall, this work shows that the advantages of modularity in neural systems can be greatly improved upon when models represent the structure of module reuse. Both these features working in tandem lead to learning on timescales similar to biological intelligences, and hence provide a model for how such fast, adaptable behavior can emerge from systems of neurons.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.7%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.2%
3
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.8%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.3%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
7
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
8
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
9
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
10
Biological Cybernetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
14
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.9%
19
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.9%
21
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%