Back

Inferring Cell-Cell Interaction Dynamics from Cell Trajectory Data Using Deep Attention Networks

Boyle, J.; Baker, R. E.; Byrne, H. M.

2026-07-17 cell biology
10.64898/2026.07.14.707033 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Interactions between nearby cells are a key driver of cell movement in many biological systems, including collective cell migration and the immune response to cancer. However, inferring the interaction rules in a given system in a manner that is both accurate and biologically interpretable remains a challenge. A valuable experimental method for analysing cell-cell interaction dynamics is the tracking of individual cell locations over a series of time-lapse images, and in this work we present a model, based on the theory of deep attention networks, that learns how cell-cell interactions affect cell movement directly from cell trajectory data. Our approach requires no a priori assumptions about the mechanisms governing cell behaviour, enabling its application to cell trajectory data originating from a diverse range of biological systems. In addition to the model, we develop a suite of tools that exploit the models attention-based structure to present the learned interaction dynamics in an interpretable manner. Our model extends previous applications of deep attention networks to cell movement by providing deeper insights into cell-cell interaction dynamics, moving beyond inferring whether cells interact to inferring how these interactions affect cell movement, and providing the ability to infer type dependent cell-cell interaction dynamics in multi-type cell movement systems. By combining data-driven learning and structural interpretability, our approach represents a highly general methodology for linking cell trajectory data to mechanistic hypotheses, showing that deep attention networks constitute a powerful exploratory tool for characterising the effect of cell-cell interactions on cell movement in complex cellular systems.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.