Across-Site MRI Prediction of Substantial Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Endometrial Cancer: Radiomics versus Deep Learning Features
Di Giovanni, D. A.; Tanaka, A.; Horikoshi, T.; Tsuboyama, T.; Yokota, H.; Zakarian, R.; Matsumoto, Y.; Vallieres, M.; Reinhold, C.
Show abstract
Purpose: To compare the cross-site generalization of radiomic features and deep learning embeddings for MRI prediction of substantial lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in endometrial cancer. Materials and Methods: This retrospective two-center study included 206 women (mean age, 59.8 years) with endometrial cancer who underwent preoperative 3-T MRI from March 2016 to March 2023. Hospital A (n = 130) was used for development and Hospital B (n = 76) for strict external testing. T2-weighted, reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted, and apparent diffusion coefficient images were manually segmented. Radiomic features and seed-pooled embeddings from 3D ResNet18, DenseNet121, and U-NEXtractor were modeled with elastic-net logistic regression or XGBoost. Out-of-fold Platt calibration and sensitivity-targeted thresholds were estimated using development data only. AUCs were summarized with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals. Results: External radiomics with elastic-net achieved an AUC of 0.609 (95% CI: 0.464, 0.740) and sensitivity of 0 of 12 (0%). DenseNet121 with elastic-net had the highest external AUC (0.685; 95% CI: 0.538, 0.822) but sensitivity of 3 of 12 (25%). U-NEXtractor with elastic-net detected 10 of 12 positive cases (83.3%) with specificity of 32 of 64 (50.0%) and balanced accuracy of 0.667. XGBoost showed higher apparent development performance but weaker external operating behavior. Conclusion: Under real-world cross-site MRI acquisition shift, DenseNet121 and U-NEXtractor embeddings showed better external generalization than handcrafted radiomic features for substantial LVSI prediction.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.