Back

Multi-tissue analyses of allele-specific chromatin accessibility nominate likely functional variants for type 2 diabetes

Narisu, N.; Li, H. X.; Rathbun, C. J. M.; Varshney, A.; Swift, A. J.; Yan, T.; Sinha, N.; Currin, K. W.; Xue, D.; Robertson, C. C.; Taylor, D. L.; Taylor, H. J.; Beck, A.; Lee, B. N.; Wang, L.; Broadaway, K. A.; Wilson, E. P.; Stringham, H.; Saramies, J.; Lakka, T. A.; Spracklen, C. N.; Scott, L. J.; Stitzel, M. L.; Tuomilehto, J.; Laakso, M.; Koistinen, H. A.; Boehnke, M.; Arda, H. E.; Chen, S.; Biesecker, L. G.; Bonnycastle, L. L.; Erdos, M. R.; Mohlke, K. L.; Parker, S. C. J.; Collins, F. S.

2026-07-15 health informatics
10.64898/2026.07.14.26358094 medRxiv
Show abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified >1,200 signals associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D), yet identifying functional variants remains challenging because the majority of them lie in noncoding regions of the genome and are in areas of high linkage disequilibrium (LD). While chromatin accessibility QTL (caQTL) and expression QTL (eQTL) analyses are useful for nominating regulatory mechanisms underlying GWAS signals, limitations still exist in pinpointing functional variants within regions of high LD. A complementary approach that has been less frequently applied is to focus on the allele-specific effect on chromatin accessibility at heterozygous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), hereafter referred to as allelic imbalance. We analyzed the allelic imbalance of reads generated from an assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq) across genotyped samples from 490 donors in T2D-relevant tissues: skeletal muscle, liver, pancreatic islets, adipose tissue, and relevant cell types. We identified 119,949 allelically imbalanced SNPs (FDR<0.05) across the genome. The allelic imbalance was often most prominent in one tissue and showed an enrichment overlapping with tissue-specific transcription factor (TF) binding footprints. Focusing on the 8,581 SNPs in previously published 99% credible sets from 338 T2D GWAS signals, we identified 256 imbalanced SNPs across 123 (36.4% of) signals, each showing allelic imbalance in at least one tissue or cell type. Of these, 71 signals contained only a single imbalanced SNP, representing excellent candidate causative variants. As a proof-of-concept, we showed that 23 of the 256 imbalanced SNPs were supported by allelic assays from previous studies. Further, we experimentally validated two imbalanced SNPs as likely functional variants: rs34584161 among a seven-SNP T2D credible set at the RNF6 signal in islets and rs849134 among a 13-SNP credible set at the JAZF1 signal in liver. This study demonstrates the power of integrating ATAC-seq allelic imbalance (ASAI) with GWAS statistical fine-mapping to identify candidate functional regulatory variants from among tightly linked GWAS variants in disease-relevant tissues. While applied here in T2D, this approach represents a widely applicable high-throughput framework for refining the genetic architecture of complex traits.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 7%
19.0%
2
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.1%
3
Diabetes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.1%
5
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.3%
7
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
8
Diabetologia
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
9
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.5%
10
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
12
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
15
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
16
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
17
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
18
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
19
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
21
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
24
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
26
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%