Back

Large-scale automated detection reveals pervasive sex imbalance in biomedical research

Valtadoros, L. E.; Hicks, P.; Yuan, H.; Ahmadian, M.; Johnson, K. A.; Krishnan, A.

2026-07-14 genomics
10.64898/2026.07.13.738332 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sex is a critical biological variable that impacts disease risk, progression, and treatment response across virtually every organ system. However, decades of biomedical research have relied primarily on male study subjects, leaving large gaps in our understanding of female-specific disease biology. Quantifying the extent of this imbalance across thousands of disease areas and millions of publicly available biological samples has remained computationally intractable. Here, we present a multimodal computational framework that infers the biological sex of [~]230,000 publicly available human transcriptome samples and links inferred sex labels to disease terms extracted from [~]9,000 associated study records and [~]5,000 publication abstracts to quantify sex imbalance at scale. Applying this approach revealed that the majority of disease terms with the largest research-derived sex imbalance are skewed toward male representation, including areas with no known biological justification for that imbalance. After adjusting for global sex-specific disease prevalence to isolate biologically unjustified imbalance, up to 58% of all disease terms showed male-leaning association. Diseases including glioblastoma, cirrhosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and schizophrenia emerged as critically understudied in females despite affecting both sexes comparably. These findings provide a principled, data-driven basis for prioritizing compensatory research efforts and offer a reusable framework for ongoing monitoring of sex representation in the biomedical literature. HighlightsO_LISkewed male and female study subject representation in biomedical research is the result of decades of studies conducted without adequate female representation. C_LIO_LIWe developed an automated, multimodal framework to estimate the sex imbalance across thousands of disease terms using metadata from [~]230,000 transcriptomics samples and their associated [~]9,000 studies and [~]5,000 publications. C_LIO_LIOur approach identifies non-sex-specific disease research areas that have been studied using an unbalanced sex demographic. These areas need compensatory and balanced studies to understand sex differences. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
2
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.9%
3
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.3%
4
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.2%
5
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.5%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
7
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.0%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
11
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
12
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
14
Database
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
18
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
23
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
24
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
25
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.0%
26
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
27
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
28
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
29
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
30
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%