Back

Learned landmark associations support online visual control under degraded visibility

Roessling, G.; Fajen, B.

2026-07-15 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.07.13.738310 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Humans and other animals often act in environments that are at least partly familiar, where aspects of the spatial layout are known. Although such knowledge is known to support navigation and spatial cognition, its role in the online control of action remains unclear. We investigated whether drivers use knowledge of road layout to guide steering in high and low visibility and, if so, the form of such knowledge. In two simulated driving experiments (total N = 90), participants repeatedly drove winding roads containing segments with and without fog. Drivers who repeatedly experienced the same road exhibited more stable steering and lane positioning than drivers encountering novel roads, but only when visibility was reduced. These advantages were accompanied by superior performance on post-tests assessing knowledge of road geometry. We next examined the form of such knowledge by dissociating global knowledge of road layout from local associations between landmarks and road segments. Disrupting landmark-road segment associations produced the largest impairment in steering performance. The benefits of prior experience were largely preserved when road-segment order was scrambled but landmark associations remained intact. These findings show that spatial knowledge can support moment-to-moment steering control when visibility is reduced. Rather than relying on a globally coherent representation of the environment, drivers use local associations between landmarks and upcoming road geometry to anticipate future demands. More broadly, the results elucidate how familiarity with environmental structure contributes to the control of action when visual information is degraded, revealing a close interplay between spatial knowledge and visual control. Significance StatementPeople routinely act within surroundings they have encountered before, from commuting on the same streets to walking familiar hallways. Whether the spatial knowledge acquired from such experience actually shapes online visual control remains an open question. Using a simulated driving task, we show that familiarity with a road improves steering stability specifically when visibility is reduced, and that this benefit depends on learned associations between landmarks and upcoming road geometry rather than a global cognitive map. The results indicate that spatial knowledge plays a key role in moment-to-moment control, letting drivers anticipate road segments they cannot yet see. Unfamiliar roads and impaired spatial learning may compound the risks of poor visibility, suggesting a role for driver-assistance systems that leverage landmarks.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
16.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.6%
3
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.9%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.3%
8
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.3%
9
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
10
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
12
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
19
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Communications Psychology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Animal Cognition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
23
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%