Back

Processing at Phrase Boundaries During Self-Paced Reading

Hooper, J.; Dengler, J.; Basilico, D.; Nelson, M. J.

2026-07-14 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.13.738177 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sentence comprehension requires the incremental construction of syntactic structure and semantic interpretation. Prior neural work (Nelson et al., 2017) identified key neural events at major phrase boundaries during sentence comprehension. To investigate a behavioral correlation of these processes, we used self-paced reading to examine the impact of syntactic phase boundaries, semantic congruence, and sentence structure on sentence processing. Participants read object-relative, subject-relative, and canonical control sentences one word at a time and a subsequent comprehension task. Reading times were analyzed relative to phrase boundaries, node-closing operations, and semantic congruence. Object-relative sentences produced the greatest processing difficulty, demonstrated by increased reading times and decreased comprehension accuracy. Reading times peaked at the phrase boundaries, indicating that processing costs are tied to constituent completion rather than individual lexical categories. Reading times also increased with the number of syntactic constituents completed at a phrase boundary. Agent-patient semantic congruence produced its largest effects in object-relative sentences, suggesting that semantic information interacts with syntactic computations when processing demands are greatest. These findings demonstrate that self-paced reading is sensitive to the incremental processing associated with syntactic constituent completion. Processing costs are tied more closely to phrase completion than to individual lexical categories, scale with the amount of syntactic structure completed at a boundary and interact with agent-patient semantic interpretation during object-relative sentence comprehension. Together, these findings support a view of sentence comprehension in which syntactic structure building and semantic interpretation proceed incrementally and interact continuously throughout online language processing.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.6%
3
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.7%
4
Neurobiology of Language
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
5
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
6
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
Psychological Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.9%
9
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
10
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
13
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
14
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
17
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.9%
19
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
21
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
22
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
23
npj Science of Learning
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Developmental Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
28
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
29
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%