Back

Gene Regulatory Networks that support Multi-Fate Cellular Decisions

BV, H.; Adigwe, S.; Jolly, M. K.; Gedeon, T.

2026-07-15 systems biology
10.64898/2026.07.13.738161 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWCell fate decisions are driven by gene regulatory networks (GRNs). While the mutually inhibitory toggle switch effectively models binary fate decisions, fully connected inhibitory networks with more than two nodes fail to capture multi-fate decisions due to the low prevalence of "single high states", where only a single master regulator is highly expressed. The goal of this study is to find network structures that support all single high states. We find that the only network that attains the highest possible prevalence of all single high states within the set of monotone Boolean (MB) models is completely disconnected. Since biological networks typically require connectivity, we investigate network structures that support equipotency, where all single high states have equal prevalence within MB models. Finally, we characterize the networks that support multistability between all single high states, finding that it is possible only in networks in which each node either has self-activations or is inhibited by every other network node. Our findings provide a theoretical framework for understanding the network design principles that can support simultaneous differentiation into multiple distinct cell types.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.1%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.1%
5
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
6
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
7
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.3%
9
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
11
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 23%
2.3%
13
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.1%
16
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
17
Biosystems
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
18
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
19
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
20
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
21
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.6%
27
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%