In silico framework for benchmarking optogenetic hearing restoration
Khurana, L.; Nejedly, P.; Jagger, D.; Moser, T.; Jablonski, L.
Show abstract
Cochlear implants (CI) partially restore hearing in profoundly hearing impaired or deaf people by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve. A bottleneck of electrical CIs is the broad spread of electrical current from each electrode that limits the transfer of spectral information, which might be overcome by future spatially confined optogenetic stimulation. Here we established an in silico framework, FraSCO, to model sound encoding in the human cochlea by an optogenetic CI (oCI) for testing the potential of optogenetic hearing restoration. The biophysical modeling framework combined an optical raytracing model implementing a human cochlea implanted with a waveguide-based oCI with a single compartment model of optogenetically modified spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs). The input was an optogenetic sound coding strategy and the quality of the neural representation was evaluated based on comparison of neurograms evoked by optogenetic and electrical stimulation to the spectrogram of the sound applied. The model aimed for technologically feasible properties of the oCIs with 64 stimulation channels. The biophysical modeling framework successfully captured essential physiological features of optogenetic SGN stimulation with a minimal set of ion channel types expressed in the SGN soma. Working with a sample of 1000 SGNs distributed along the tonotopic axis to represent sound encoding, we found that improved spectral selectivity more than compensates for lower temporal fidelity of current implementations of optogenetic stimulation. The established computational framework enables in silico investigation and benchmarking of sound encoding in the cochlea by future oCI and state-of-the-art eCI. The results indicate that optogenetic sound encoding has potential to improve speech understanding in noisy environments for CI users.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Explainable Machine Learning Predictions of Perceptual Sensitivity for Retinal Prostheses 94%
- Statistical Characterization of Cortical-Thalamic Dynamics Evoked by Cortical Stimulation in Mice 94%
- Combining biophysical models and machine learning to optimize implant geometry and stimulation protocol for intraneural electrodes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Selection of stimulus parameters for enhancing slow wave sleep events with a Neural-field theory thalamocortical computational model 94%
- HippoUnit: A software tool for the automated testing and systematic comparison of detailed models of hippocampal neurons based on electrophysiological data 93%
- BlueRecording: A Pipeline for the efficient calculation of extracellular recordings in large-scale neural circuit models 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the Use of Envelope Following Responses to Estimate Peripheral Level Compression in the Auditory System 95%
- EEG-based diagnostics of the auditory system using cochlear implant electrodes as sensors 94%
- An Open-Source Deep Learning-Based Toolbox forAutomated Auditory Brainstem Response Analyses (ABRA) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel machine learning-based approach for the detection and analysis of spontaneous synaptic currents 94%
- Steady state evoked potential (SSEP) responses in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices of anesthetized cats: nonlinearity characterized by harmonic and intermodulation frequencies 93%
- Exploring the distribution of statistical feature parameters for natural sound textures 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intrinsic noise improves speech recognition in a computational model of the auditory pathway 96%
- Optimal Multichannel Artifact Prediction and Removal for Brain Machine Interfaces and Neural Prosthetics 96%
- Predicting the Influence of Axon Myelination on Sound Localization Precision Using a Spiking Neural Network Model of Auditory Brainstem 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.