Back

Protein tertiary packing is nearly achiral

Khare, S. D.

2026-07-14 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.07.13.737334 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The chirality of proteins originates at the C stereocentre of each L-amino acid, and is expressed in secondary structure as the consistent twist of -helices and {beta}-sheets. How far does this handedness propagate as secondary-structure elements pack into a tertiary fold? This question is central to the development of neural networks for the design of heterochiral and mixed-chirality proteins containing mirror-image D-amino acids. Such networks are most effectively trained on the far more abundant structural data available for natural all-L proteins, yet in practice they must generate and evaluate the reflected, D-configured counterparts, which are not explicitly represented in the training set. Here, I develop a spatial tessellation-based parity-odd descriptor, the signed volume of Delaunay tetrahedra (VD), to measure how chirality is distributed in protein structure. Reflecting a structure only flips the sign of any parity-odd descriptor, so the asymmetry of the VD distribution quantifies the chirality of a given sequence-local or tertiary structural element. I find that the signed Delaunay volume distribution within individual secondary-structure elements is strongly asymmetric, but this handedness largely cancels once elements pack against one another. The resulting tertiary distribution is nearly symmetric across a broad range of structures, from monomers to protein-protein and protein-ligand complexes. Individual folds can nonetheless be strongly handed at the tertiary scale, solenoid and repeat proteins most of all, yet across a broad sample of the fold universe this handedness cancels, leaving the ensemble near-achiral. Tertiary packing is therefore only weakly chiral, with the small residual handedness greatest at binding interfaces and near-zero in the buried core. How much chirality a model perceives in a D-protein is thus largely a choice of representation, a trade-off between reflection symmetry and the richness of structural information the representation retains. Because VDreduces the parity-odd content of each structural element to a single scalar while capturing tertiary protein packing, it offers a natural representation for the design of heterochiral complexes and mixed-chirality proteins. Significance StatementThe macromolecules of life are handed, and this mirror-asymmetry is built into every protein at the scale of its amino-acid monomers. Local segments of proteins are also strongly handed. Alpha helices and beta sheets are consistently right-handed. Does this handedness build up through the layers of a proteins structure, as in some synthetic polymers, or cancel? Using a geometric test across thousands of structures, we find that it largely cancels: the 3D-packing of a folded protein, when described as a tetrahedral tessellation, is almost symmetric under reflection, though its building blocks are not. This means that the design of mirror-image D-protein binders, which are attractive as protease-resistant, low-immunogenicity drug candidates, could rely on AI models trained only on natural L-proteins, using representations developed here.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
18.6%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 19%
8.9%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.9%
4
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.8%
6
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.3%
8
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
9
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
11
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.4%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
21
Physical Review X
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
23
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
27
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
29
Nature Chemistry
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%