Back

Rt3DE-based finite element analysis of functional tricuspid regurgitation and RV free wall approximation

Tondi, D.; Vailetta, S.; Sturla, F.; Vismara, R.; Votta, E.

2026-07-14 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.07.13.736182 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeFunctional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) is driven by right ventricular (RV) remodeling, annular dilation, and papillary muscle dislocation. Free wall approximation (FWA) has been proposed to treat FTR by addressing RV dilation, but its effects on tricuspid valve (TV) biomechanics remain unclear. We present a real-time 3D echocardiographic (rt3DE)-based finite element framework to quantify TV biomechanics under FTR, and preliminarily apply it to assess FWA effects. MethodsSubject-specific models were developed from rt3DE data of three dilated porcine hearts in an ex-vivo mock-loop. TV geometries at end-diastole and peak systole (PS) were complemented by parametric chordae tendineae and hyperelastic tissue properties. TV closure was simulated under a standard pressure load and image-based annular motion. After tuning chordae length to replicate the PS ground truth in FTR, FWA was simulated as 30% and 60% approximations along three anatomical directions (anterior-posterior, A-P; anterior-septal, A-S; anterior-septal wall, A-SW). ResultsIn FTR simulations, median geometric errors ranged from 1.16 to 1.26 mm; median stress ranged from 56.4 to 74.7 kPa. FWA simulations predicted regurgitant orifice area (ROA) reductions by 53-99%, albeit overestimating the residual ROA vs. in vitro ground truth when starting from particularly extreme FTR conditions; concomitantly, a median stress reduction by 8-43% vs. FTR conditions was predicted. ConclusionPreliminary data suggest that our rt3DE-based framework can reliably quantify FTR-related TV biomechanics and that post-FWA biomechanics depends on initial FTR conditions. A larger cohort is required to verify the method and obtain statistically significant results.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.1%
2
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.9%
5
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
9
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
10
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
12
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
18
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.8%
20
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
23
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%