Back

Clonal hematopoiesis is enriched in melanoma and associated with genotype-specific differences in tumor growth and survival

Alford-Holloway, M. N.; Reed, S. C.; Pershad, Y.; Van Amburg, J. C.; Potts, C.; Mohan, S. R.; Luo, L. Y.; Ferrell, P. B.; Savona, M. R.; Park, B. H.; Johnson, D. B.; Bick, A. G.; Kishtagari, A.

2026-07-16 oncology
10.64898/2026.07.13.26357981 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background The clinical significance of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) in melanoma remains incompletely defined, particularly with respect to CHIP genotype, clone size, and somatic mutations (e.g BRAF mutations). We integrated human cohort data and a syngeneic melanoma mouse model to evaluate whether CHIP is associated with melanoma risk, tumor growth, and differential clinical outcomes. Methods We analyzed CHIP prevalence and survival in a large treatment-unselected melanoma cohort (n=2,480), evaluated tumor growth in a syngeneic BRAF-mutant (BRAFmut) melanoma murine model of TET2-CHIP and DNMT3A-CHIP, and assessed survival outcomes in an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated advanced melanoma cohort (n=361). Associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results CHIP was enriched among patients with treatment-unselected melanoma compared with age/sex-matched healthy controls, and larger CHIP clone size showed an age-adjusted association with inferior OS. In a syngeneic BRAFmut melanoma murine model, TET2-CHIP, but not DNMT3A-CHIP, was associated with significantly increased primary melanoma tumor growth. Among patients with ICI-treated advanced melanoma, CHIP was associated with worse OS compared with patients without CHIP. TET2-CHIP had the strongest adverse association with survival, whereas DNMT3A-CHIP was not significantly associated with PFS or OS. Conclusions CHIP is enriched in melanoma and exploratory analyses demonstrate genotype-specific differences in melanoma tumor growth and clinical outcomes. These findings support further investigation of genotype-specific CHIP profiling as a potential biomarker for melanoma risk stratification and immunotherapy outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.1%
4
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.0%
7
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
9
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.1%
12
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
The Journal of Immunology
166 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
15
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
19
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
20
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
21
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
22
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
25
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
27
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%