Back

DELENDA: Differentiable Epidemiology for Latent-state Estimation and Nonlinear Decision Analysis

Suresh, J.

2026-07-15 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.07.13.26357962 medRxiv
Show abstract

Malaria subnational tailoring is often a population-level allocation problem: which interventions should be prioritized, at what coverage, and under what budget and uncertainty assumptions? We present DELENDA, a differentiable compartmental model of Plasmodium falciparum transmission designed for posterior calibration and intervention-mix optimization. We fit a NUTS posterior jointly to age-stratified prevalence and clinical-incidence data from five sub-Saharan African sites plus three pre-intervention Garki Project villages, spanning a broad entomological inoculation rate (EIR) range. DELENDA is implemented in JAX, which makes the full simulation differentiable. This enables efficient Bayesian inference and continuous constrained optimization over intervention coverage. We apply the framework to an illustrative decision problem: a highly seasonal transmission setting where coverage is optimized for ITNs, SMC, IRS, and pediatric malaria vaccination across EIR, budget, objective, and uncertainty grids. Three findings are decision-relevant. First, intervention rankings are more robust than projected impact: posterior, vector-biology, and intervention-efficacy uncertainty change optimized coverage modestly but substantially widen the distribution of cases averted. Second, the objective matters: under-five optimization brings child-targeted SMC and vaccination in earlier, whereas all-age optimization delays vaccination and favors broader population protection through IRS. Third, cost uncertainty is mainly a constraint-side problem: expected-cost optima have material budget-overrun probability, while tail-risk budget rules sharply reduce overrun risk at the cost of lower effective coverage and fewer expected cases averted. DELENDA therefore demonstrates an uncertainty-first approach to subnational tailoring: differentiable model structure exposes the biological parameter space to posterior calibration and carries biological and operational uncertainty into constrained decision optimization, tasks that are difficult with the non-differentiable models currently central to SNT workflows.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
30.5%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.7%
3
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
7
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
8
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Malaria Journal
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
13
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.3%
15
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
17
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
22
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%