Intermittent theta burst stimulation modulates working memory-related theta-gamma coupling in adolescents with ADHD

Objective: Working memory (WM) deficits are a co-occurring feature to numerous neuropsychiatric disorders, particularly attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and there remain no treatments that directly target WM. The coupling between the phase of theta band activity and amplitude of gamma band activity (i.e., TGC) is an established neural correlate of WM. However, no studies have examined WM-related TGC in ADHD or whether neuromodulation can modulate these oscillatory dynamics in youth. This set of studies examined the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and left posterior parietal cortex (PPC) on TGC in youth with ADHD. Methods: In two randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover trials, adolescents with ADHD and clinically significant parent-reported WM symptoms first completed a single-session study comparing DLPFC versus PPC iTBS targeting (n = 47) and then a multi-session clinical trial comparing 10 sessions of active versus sham left DLPFC iTBS (n = 29). Participants completed a computerized visuospatial Sternberg WM task with concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) before and after the single sessions, as well as at baseline, midway through treatment, and approximately 24 hours after the final session within the multi-session trial. Phase-amplitude coupling between theta phase and gamma amplitude was quantified using the Kullback Leibler modulation index at frontoparietal electrodes. Linear mixed-effects models examined treatment effects and associations between change in TGC and WM status (including accuracy, reaction time, and clinical symptoms). Results: Across participants, lower TGC was associated with lower symptoms and better WM performance, including higher accuracy, faster and more consistent RT. Active iTBS increased frontoparietal TGC relative to sham stimulation, with effects observed both acutely after a single session and ~24 hours after multiple sessions. DLPFC-targeted iTBS increased TGC, whereas PPC-iTBS had no measurable effect. Change in TGC was associated with change in WM, such that a decrease in TGC was associated with faster RT and decreased RT variability. Higher baseline TGC was associated with greater improvement in WM. Active iTBS decoupled the TGC-WM association observed during sham iTBS, and greater electric field intensity of iTBS was associated with greater improvement in WM accuracy and greater decrease in TGC. Conclusions: Active iTBS to the left DLPFC modulated WM-related TGC in youth with ADHD. These findings provide preliminary evidence that neuromodulation may improve WW by modifying oscillatory dynamics within frontoparietal networks. Larger clinical trials with higher stimulation doses are needed to determine whether targeting oscillatory coupling represents a potential therapeutic strategy for WM deficits.