Back

MASLD prevalence by ultrasonography and clinical profile in obese adults attending a Mexican primary care unit: a cross-sectional study

Nieves Ruiz, E. R.; Godinez Vazquez, V. J.; Arguello Flores, R.; Cruz, A. A.; Belman Estrada, F. M.

2026-07-15 primary care research
10.64898/2026.07.13.26357943 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is linked to obesity and cardiometabolic dysfunction, yet local prevalence data from Mexican first-level care units are scarce. We estimated the prevalence of MASLD by B-mode ultrasonography and characterized the clinical profile of obese adults in a family medicine unit in Leon, Mexico. Methods: Cross-sectional study of 55 adults with obesity (body mass index [BMI] >=30 kg/m2) registered at one medical office of a Mexican Social Security Institute family medicine unit (April-October 2024). Hepatic steatosis was graded by B-mode ultrasonography; MASLD was defined as ultrasonographic steatosis plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion (all participants met the obesity criterion). Prevalence was reported with Wilson 95% confidence intervals (CIs); associations with obesity grade were assessed by Cochran-Armitage trend and Fisher exact tests. Results: MASLD was present in 37 of 55 participants (67.3%; 95% CI, 54.1-78.2). Mild (grade 1) steatosis predominated (45.5%). Prevalence increased across obesity grades: 59.0%, 75.0%, and 100% for grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively (trend P=0.022). Type 2 diabetes and hypertension each affected 50.9% of participants; the sample was predominantly female (74.5%). Conclusion: Two of every three obese adults screened in primary care had ultrasonographic MASLD, with a significant rise across obesity grades. Opportunistic ultrasonography in obese primary-care patients may enable earlier MASLD detection. Keywords: Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Fatty Liver; Obesity; Ultrasonography; Primary Health Care; Prevalence

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 5%
28.2%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
19.7%
3
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Public Health Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.9%
5
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
7
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
8
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
9
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
10
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
11
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
13
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
The Pharmacogenomics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
JAMA
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
18
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
19
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
21
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
22
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
24
British Journal of General Practice
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%