Back

Data-driven calibration of low-cost wearable motion trackers for gait and dynamic stability measurement

He, Y.; Dong, Y.; Brodie, M. A.; Kim, J.; Lord, S. R.; Okubo, Y.

2026-07-15 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.07.13.26357919 medRxiv
Show abstract

Low cost inside out wearable trackers can be deployed at scale to measure body motion, but errors in estimated sensor position propagate through coordinate transformations into derived gait and dynamic-stability metrics. Healthy adults walked on a treadmill at 0.5 to 2.0 m/s while VIVE Ultimate Tracker (VUT) and Vicon data were recorded. Data-driven calibration models were developed to correct tracker coordinates and to estimate full body centre of mass (CoM) from a sacrum-only configuration. Agreement with Vicon was assessed using RMSE, mixed-effects Bland-Altman limits of agreement, MAE, and intraclass correlation coefficients. Calibration improved coordinate-level agreement. For gait parameters, model-corrected VUT showed small errors against Vicon (MAE: 0.24 to 0.71 mm step height, 1.73 to 4.63 mm step length, 0.15 to 0.95 mm step width, 0.26 to 0.88 mm foot clearance). Proxy CoM-derived margin of stability (MoS) agreed excellently with Vicon. For the sacrum-only pipeline, calibration reduced CoM RMSE from 103.65 to 104.04 mm to 7.55 to 8.95 mm, and markedly reduced systematic error in stability outcomes, with extrapolated CoM bias decreasing from 172.92 to 0.29 mm and MoS bias from -75.09 to -3.54 mm. Data-driven calibration improved the measurement utility of low-cost VUTs, enabling inexpensive, relatively simple gait and stability measurement from a sacrum-only setup in controlled settings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Gait & Posture
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.9%
4
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 26%
5.6%
6
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
7
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.2%
9
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
10
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
19
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%