Back

Screen-Detected and Diagnostic Breast Cancers Show Distinct Treatment Pathways and Quality Indicator Performance

Bielcikova, Z.; Tichopad, A.; Rybar, M.; Petrakova, K.; Rozanek, M.; Mothejlova, K.; Dusek, L.; Donin, G.

2026-07-16 oncology
10.64898/2026.07.13.26357901 medRxiv
Show abstract

Population-based mammography screening improves breast cancer outcomes, but its impact on real-world treatment pathways and quality indicators (QIs) remains incompletely described. We conducted a retrospective nationwide cohort study using linked data from the Czech National Cancer Registry and the National Registry of Reimbursed Health Services. Women aged [≥]18 years with a first breast cancer diagnosis between 2017 and 2024 were classified as screen-detected (SCR) or diagnostically-detected (DIG) according to the imaging modality preceding histological verification. Outcomes included stage distribution, untreated cases, first-line treatment, main treatment modality, time to treatment, multidisciplinary team discussion (MDT), centralization to Comprehensive Cancer Centres (COCs), and survival patterns. The verified cohort included 47,648 women: 26,817 SCR cases (56.3 %) and 20,831 DIG cases (43.7 %). In this nationwide analysis, SCR breast cancer was associated with earlier stage at diagnosis and better survival patterns, but also with longer time to treatment and longer time to MDT discussion than DIG-detected disease. Although treatment rates were high and centralization improved over time, substantial regional variation persisted in care pathways, MDT use, and access to COCs. These findings support continued strengthening of screening participation, monitoring of care intervals, and quality assurance of MDT reporting and regional oncology care delivery.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.7%
3
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.6%
5
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.4%
6
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
7
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.3%
8
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
11
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
12
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
13
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
14
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
15
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
17
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
18
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
20
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
21
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
22
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
24
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
27
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
29
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%