Screen-Detected and Diagnostic Breast Cancers Show Distinct Treatment Pathways and Quality Indicator Performance
Bielcikova, Z.; Tichopad, A.; Rybar, M.; Petrakova, K.; Rozanek, M.; Mothejlova, K.; Dusek, L.; Donin, G.
Show abstract
Population-based mammography screening improves breast cancer outcomes, but its impact on real-world treatment pathways and quality indicators (QIs) remains incompletely described. We conducted a retrospective nationwide cohort study using linked data from the Czech National Cancer Registry and the National Registry of Reimbursed Health Services. Women aged [≥]18 years with a first breast cancer diagnosis between 2017 and 2024 were classified as screen-detected (SCR) or diagnostically-detected (DIG) according to the imaging modality preceding histological verification. Outcomes included stage distribution, untreated cases, first-line treatment, main treatment modality, time to treatment, multidisciplinary team discussion (MDT), centralization to Comprehensive Cancer Centres (COCs), and survival patterns. The verified cohort included 47,648 women: 26,817 SCR cases (56.3 %) and 20,831 DIG cases (43.7 %). In this nationwide analysis, SCR breast cancer was associated with earlier stage at diagnosis and better survival patterns, but also with longer time to treatment and longer time to MDT discussion than DIG-detected disease. Although treatment rates were high and centralization improved over time, substantial regional variation persisted in care pathways, MDT use, and access to COCs. These findings support continued strengthening of screening participation, monitoring of care intervals, and quality assurance of MDT reporting and regional oncology care delivery.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 in breast cancer patients: a cohort at the Institut Curie hospitals in the Paris area 95%
- A prospective study on tumour response assessments methods after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in early oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer 93%
- Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The prognostic value of lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is different among breast cancer subtypes 95%
- Analysis of HER2-low breast cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand: a nationwide retrospective cohort study 95%
- The French Early Breast Cancer Cohort (FRESH): a resource for breast cancer research and evaluations of oncology practices based on the French National Healthcare System Database (SNDS) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Added-value of whole exome and RNA Sequencing in advanced and refractory cancer patients with no molecular-based treatment recommendation based on a 90-gene panel 92%
- A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients with Cancer 91%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostic model including the benefits and harms of radiotherapy 95%
- RNA Sequencing-Based Single Sample Predictors of Molecular Subtype and Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Assessment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer 94%
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.