Back

NEO-EXCEL: Neoadjuvant trial of pre-operative exemestane or letrozole, with or without celecoxib, in the treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive postmenopausal early breast cancer: A phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Francis, A.; Patel, A.; Pirrie, S. J.; Prest, C.; Brookes, C. L.; Bartlett, J. M. S.; Stein, R. C.; Dunn, J. A.; Canney, P.; Poole, C. J.; Patel, A. R.; Grant, M.; Herring, K.; Southgate, E.; Gaunt, C.; Bowden, S. J.; Rea, D. W.

2026-07-15 oncology
10.64898/2026.07.13.26356308 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background The NEO-EXCEL trial hypothesised that aromatase inhibitor (AI)-activity as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for early-stage breast cancer in postmenopausal women may be enhanced in combination with cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibition. Methods NEO-EXCEL was a phase III, placebo-controlled, randomised trial in postmenopausal women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive resectable breast cancer with tumours [≥]2cm. Women were randomised (1:1:1:1): exemestane (25mg od) plus celecoxib (400mg bid), exemestane (25mg od) plus placebo (bid), letrozole (2.5mg od) plus celecoxib (400mg bid), or letrozole (2.5mg od) plus placebo (bid). Primary endpoint was clinical response (complete/partial) measured by callipers at 16 weeks; a standard assessment method at the time of trial inception. Sixteen-week ultrasound-determined response was the main secondary outcome to verify the calliper-based primary. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Results Due to slow accrual the trial design was redesigned from a definitive 2x2, 1000 patient trial to one randomising 269 patients between 20-Nov-2007 and 29-Apr-2014; 34.9% were human epithelial growth factor receptor 2-positive. AI+celecoxib produced a significantly greater objective clinical response than AI+placebo (72.9% vs 55.6%, P=0.003), which remained after adjustment for AI type and stratification factors (odds ratio = 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-3.8, P=0.003). Ultrasound-determined response was however not significantly enhanced (48.7% [AI+celecoxib] vs 41.2% [AI+placebo], P=0.34). Progression free survival and overall survival remained similar (median follow-up = 5.1 years [range 0.1-7.1]). Conclusions NEO-EXCEL is the first completed, phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled trial testing the addition of celecoxib to AI as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer. Clinical response showed significant improvement but there was no significant ultrasound-determined response improvement nor any surgical or long-term outcome evidence of AI+COX-2 inhibition improving treatment outcomes for ER+ early resectable postmenopausal breast cancers. Use of short-term celecoxib at 400mg bd for 16 weeks was safe with no excess cardiotoxicity observed.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.5%
3
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
4
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
5
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.1%
7
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
9
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
10
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
12
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
13
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.3%
15
Pharmacological Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.9%
21
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
American Journal of Gastroenterology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Endocrinology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%