NEO-EXCEL: Neoadjuvant trial of pre-operative exemestane or letrozole, with or without celecoxib, in the treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive postmenopausal early breast cancer: A phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Francis, A.; Patel, A.; Pirrie, S. J.; Prest, C.; Brookes, C. L.; Bartlett, J. M. S.; Stein, R. C.; Dunn, J. A.; Canney, P.; Poole, C. J.; Patel, A. R.; Grant, M.; Herring, K.; Southgate, E.; Gaunt, C.; Bowden, S. J.; Rea, D. W.
Show abstract
Background The NEO-EXCEL trial hypothesised that aromatase inhibitor (AI)-activity as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for early-stage breast cancer in postmenopausal women may be enhanced in combination with cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibition. Methods NEO-EXCEL was a phase III, placebo-controlled, randomised trial in postmenopausal women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive resectable breast cancer with tumours [≥]2cm. Women were randomised (1:1:1:1): exemestane (25mg od) plus celecoxib (400mg bid), exemestane (25mg od) plus placebo (bid), letrozole (2.5mg od) plus celecoxib (400mg bid), or letrozole (2.5mg od) plus placebo (bid). Primary endpoint was clinical response (complete/partial) measured by callipers at 16 weeks; a standard assessment method at the time of trial inception. Sixteen-week ultrasound-determined response was the main secondary outcome to verify the calliper-based primary. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Results Due to slow accrual the trial design was redesigned from a definitive 2x2, 1000 patient trial to one randomising 269 patients between 20-Nov-2007 and 29-Apr-2014; 34.9% were human epithelial growth factor receptor 2-positive. AI+celecoxib produced a significantly greater objective clinical response than AI+placebo (72.9% vs 55.6%, P=0.003), which remained after adjustment for AI type and stratification factors (odds ratio = 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-3.8, P=0.003). Ultrasound-determined response was however not significantly enhanced (48.7% [AI+celecoxib] vs 41.2% [AI+placebo], P=0.34). Progression free survival and overall survival remained similar (median follow-up = 5.1 years [range 0.1-7.1]). Conclusions NEO-EXCEL is the first completed, phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled trial testing the addition of celecoxib to AI as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer. Clinical response showed significant improvement but there was no significant ultrasound-determined response improvement nor any surgical or long-term outcome evidence of AI+COX-2 inhibition improving treatment outcomes for ER+ early resectable postmenopausal breast cancers. Use of short-term celecoxib at 400mg bd for 16 weeks was safe with no excess cardiotoxicity observed.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A prospective study on tumour response assessments methods after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in early oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer 92%
- Studies of parenchymal texture added to mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature 92%
- Effect of testosterone therapy on breast tissue composition and mammographic breast density in trans masculine individuals 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of HER2-low breast cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand: a nationwide retrospective cohort study 94%
- Impact of BRCA mutation status on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), response to treatment, and prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 93%
- The prognostic value of lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is different among breast cancer subtypes 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in pN1 Breast Cancer: Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors From a Single-Institution Cohort 94%
- Prognostic value of the Residual Cancer Burden index according to breast cancer subtype: validation on a cohort of BC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 92%
- BREAst screening Tailored for HEr (BREATHE) - A Study Protocol On Personalised Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening Programme 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostic model including the benefits and harms of radiotherapy 94%
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death 91%
- RNA Sequencing-Based Single Sample Predictors of Molecular Subtype and Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Assessment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct temporal trends in breast cancer incidence from 1997 to 2016 by molecular subtypes: A population-based study of Scottish cancer registry data 92%
- BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial 90%
- Using targeted therapy to promote a pro-inflammatory tumour microenvironment and anti-tumour immune response in high grade serous ovarian cancer 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.