Back

hNav1.5α forms an antiparallel intracellular homodimer but is incorporated into the plasma membrane as a monomer

Schmalzing, G.; Li, L.

2026-07-14 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.07.12.738063 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Electrophysiological studies have long treated the cardiac voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.5 (SCN5A) as a monomeric pore-forming unit, consistent with all available cryo-EM structures, which show only monomeric architectures. In contrast, biochemical studies -- cross-linking, single-molecule pulldown, and native electrophoresis -- have reported [~]500 kDa Nav1.5 homodimers with coupled gating. To reconcile this apparent discrepancy, we combined selective labeling of the total (metabolic [35S]methionine) and plasma-membrane (membrane-impermeant IRDye 800CW) pools of hNav1.5 with high-resolution clear native electrophoresis (hrCNE) in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Total hNav1.5 migrated predominantly as a homodimer that dissociated into monomers upon denaturation, whereas surface-labeled hNav1.5 migrated exclusively as a monomer, confirming mature, Golgi-processed glycosylation by Endo H/PNGase F digestion. This monomer-dimer distribution was unaffected by co-expression with hNav{beta}1-{beta}4 subunits. Using an orthogonal SpyCatcher/SpyTag covalent tagging strategy, we captured the intracellular homodimer as an irreversible [~]500 kDa complex, and engineered TEV protease cleavage sites revealed that the two protomers associate in a previously unrecognized antiparallel, cyclic arrangement. AlphaFold2-Multimer confidently predicted a monomeric hNav1.5 fold but failed to generate a high-confidence homodimer interface, indicating that this arrangement is not strongly sequence-encoded. Together, our data resolve the electrophysiology-biochemistry discrepancy: hNav1.5 assembles as an antiparallel homodimer in intracellular compartments, likely subject to quality control, but is delivered to the plasma membrane -- the physiologically conducting compartment -- exclusively as a monomer, irrespective of {beta}-subunit association.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Cell
350 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.5%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 6%
12.7%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 15%
11.9%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 6%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
6
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.3%
7
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
8
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
9
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
10
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
11
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 17%
2.1%
12
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
21
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
24
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%