Back

Single cell multi-omics enables high-resolution identification and functionalpurification of human acute myeloid leukemia stem cells

Ediriwickrema, A.; Nakauchi, Y.; Kohnke, T.; Fan, A. C.; Hu, X.; Benard, B. A.; Karigane, D.; Linde, M. H.; Newman, A. M.; Gentles, A. J.; Majeti, R.

2026-07-13 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.07.12.737989 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In human acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a sub-population of leukemia stem cells (LSCs) drive disease initiation, therapeutic resistance, and relapse. However, the lack of reliable markers to distinguish LSCs from bulk leukemia cells has impeded progress in studying LSC pathogenesis and developing meaningful LSC-specific diagnostics and therapeutics. Existing LSC gene signatures, derived from bulk populations, cannot definitively identify LSCs at single-cell resolution. To address this, we analyzed large patient cohorts with bulk gene expression data and single-cell multi-omic assays to identify a prognostic gene signature that is specifically enriched in a clinically adverse AML sub-population. Using this signature, we defined and prospectively isolated CD34+CD90-CLL1-CD69+CD53- immunophenotypic LSCs that are significantly enriched for LSC content based on limiting dilution xenotransplantation assays. Our findings demonstrate the power of single-cell multi-omics to precisely identify a clinically relevant LSC population and establish a clear framework for future translational research in AML. Key PointsO_LISingle cell multi-omics identifies human AML LSCs at high resolution. C_LIO_LIHOPX and SOCS2 co-expression (hrLSC2) defines a prognostic gene signature in de novo acute myeloid leukemia. C_LIO_LIhrLSC2 marks an AML subpopulation (iLSCs) with a distinct immunophenotype. C_LIO_LIiLSCs can be purified using flow cytometry and are significantly enriched for LSCs. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
HemaSphere
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
2
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.8%
4
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.8%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.2%
6
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
8
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
9
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.2%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
11
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Haematologica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Experimental Hematology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
15
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
18
Journal of Experimental Medicine
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
20
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Cell Stem Cell
62 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
23
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%